28
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 1987
FOR
THE
THE
INFORM
MR JEAFFRESON WENT ON. THE BILL HAD PROTECTIVE CLAUSES, EXAMPLE, UNDER CLAUSE 15(2) THE COMMISSIONER WOULD HAVE TO REPORT ORDER TO FACT THAT HE HAD REVOKED THE RELEASE UNDER SUPERVISION SUPERVISION BOARD AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE, AND HE WOULD HAVE TO THE RE-IMPRISONED PRISONER OF THE REASONS WHY HE HAD REVOKED IT.
TO
OF THE
THEN THE PRISONER HIMSELF, UNDER CLAUSE 16(1) HAD THE RIGHT
THE BOARD, FOR
REVIEW A THROUGH GOVERNOR, APPLY TO THE COMMISSIONER'S DECISION.
SOME MEMBERS FOUND IT UNDULY REFERRING TO THE COMMENT THAT
WHEN HE HARSH TO REQUIRE AN OFFENDER TO FORFEIT HIS EARNED REMISSION
MR JEAFFRESON SAID HE HAD OPTED FOR RELEASE UNDER SUPERVISION SCHEME, CONSIDERABLE SYMPATHY WITH THAT VIEW.
"THE QUESTION OF THIS LOSING
OF REMISSION, UPON OPTING FOR POINTS THAT WE COME TO REVIEW THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SCHEME IN THREE YEARS' TIME," HE SAID.
RELEASE UNDER SUPERVISION SCHEME, WILL BE ONE OF THE WILL VERY CAREFULLY
RE-EXAMINE
WE WHEN
NEW PAROLE SCHEME WELCOMED
UNDER THE IN IN THE
AND PRE-RELEASE EMPLOYMENT THE RELEASE
SUPERVISION UNDER
THE PRISONERS (RELEASE SCHEMES FOR PRISONERS PROVIDED FOR IN
A STEP FORWARD SUPERVISION) BILL 1987 WOULD BE WELCOMED AS
SAID THE HON PETER C. REHABILITATION OF PRISONERS, LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL TODAY (WEDNESDAY).
WONG
AD HOC GROUP REGARDED AS
SPEAKING IN HIS CAPACITY AS CONVENER OF A LEGCO STUDYING THE BILL, MR WONG SAID THE TWO SCHEMES COULD BE A FIRST ATTEMPT TO IMPLEMENT THE CONCEPT OF PAROLE IN HONG KONG.
1972
WORKING PARTY HAD STUDIED PAROLE IN HONG KONG.
BECAUSE OF LARGELY
HE
IN
A GOVERNMENT SAID CAREFULLY A PROPOSAL TO INTRODUCE A SYSTEM OF HOWEVER, THE SYSTEM WAS NOT PURSUED AT THE TIME, INADEQUATE AFTERCARE SERVICES AND FACILITIES.
"WE HAVE SINCE THEN GAINED CONSIDERABLY MORE EXPERIENCE IN TREATMENT AND REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS," HE NOTED.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE
THE
OF A PAROLE
TO
MR WONG POINTED OUT THAT THE SYSTEM WAS TO HELP OFFENDERS TO REFORM AND FACILITATE THEIR RETURN SOCIETY.
/HE SAID
Page 30Page 31