PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference :-
LLC.O.885
[LUUrLIIN{་ - ་
19 PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE, LONDON
ALLY WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE BE REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHIC-
68
2 July 2003.]
CHOWN AGENTS' ENQUIRY COMMITTEE:
Major M. A. CAMERON, ('.M.G.
The main features of the design we should never touch because we assume that the Colony knows best what it wants to have.
1461. Even although it might be faulty-If it were faulty in construction so that it would fail down, it would have to be altered, but if a Colony sends you a three-roomed house arranged in a particular way, it would be a strong measure to suggest to them that they ought to have it differently arranged, and we should not do that.
1462. Take a marine villa, would you vary that if you thought it was of faulty construction?—It is all a matter of judgment in the individual case. We con- sider, and it is an understanding of the Colonial ffice, that we ought to point out serious defects. If we think the Colony is going to spend its money on a thing which will be unsuitable when it gets it, we are bound to point it out to them before we go on.
1463. You would hold yourselves responsible for pointing out any faulty requisition you receive?—We do.
1561. With a view to amending it either with the sanction of the Secretary of State, or by reference to the Colony Yes. If it is a minor instance, which often happens, we do not do that; we send the Colony what it has asked for, assuming that there is nothing absolutely wrong about it, but write out at the same time saying that we think they might have done better. so that they may know another time. That 15 in small cases where it is not sufficiently im- portant, and you do not want the delay of referring
ont.
■
1465. But generally you accept that responsibility of Seeing that plans, or whatever they are, are sent ?— Seeing that they will work.
116. Having got the plans and specification COIN- plete, luw do you put the thing out to tender? To whom do you send?—It depends entirely on what it is. We have a list which Mr. Harding has there of firms for every class of material we deal with.
1467. You seul to the people on your list?--Yes, but there are exceptions.
1463. Is it usual to have the material inspected ?—— That varies very much. It is not necessary to inspect everything. Of course, anything like a bungalow it is very necessary to inspect, but that is not necessary with a great deal of material.
1469. Take the material which it is necessary to in- spect what is the method of inspection?---When we give the order we send all the particulars of it to the inspector, whoever he is, and he approves all the details as the thing goes along, and inspects to what- ever extent he thinks necessary. He sees it erected in skeleton, or part of it if it is large, and examines the material itself, takes the tests he requires of the material, azul sees it right through.
1470. And you accept entire responsability for his inspection and passing of the goods or otherwise ?- What do you mean by accepting responsibility?
1171. Supposing he passed goods as sound and according to specification as shipped, and at the other end they are found not to be sound and according to specification?--We do not accept that liability in the case of what we call the outside inspectors. Formerly we used to do our work entirely through outside in- spectors, that is to say, engineers who are in general practic as inspecting or consulting engineers, and who took our work only as part of their general prac- tice. They occupy the same position towards us as consulting engineers, that is to say, we select them to the best of our ability, and keep the closest possible watch upon them, but we do not take responsibility for what they do. We have no control over them, in fact, and we can only place the work in their hands as thoroughly competent people; but in the case of the inspection which is done by our own staff we an quite prepared to take the full responsibility of that.
1472, (Chairman.) Has the Colony any say as to which method of inspection shall I adopted, because it makes a difference to them, does it not -No; it has got it is impossible to give the Colony a say in that, but we are in fact gradually abwabing very nearly the whole of the inspection. I see your point, that natur- ally they would wish us to do the inspection because
we would have to take the responsibility, but if the Colony claimed that we should do a branch of inspec tion for which we have not got proper men, and for which we are not qualified, we could not do it. We do all we can do.
1473. Is it not rather hard on the Colony-perhaps it does not happen, but would it not be rather hard it the ease suggested by Sir Ralph took place, of goods ordered turning out not to be according to specification or sample, and when they applied to you expecting that you would hold yourselves responsible, you said, "Oh, no, because our own inspectors were busy, we gave it to somebody else to inspect whom we are not responsible for "They are in exactly the same position in which they always were until a short time ago, and in which a principal who employs an agent always is.
1174. The other plan is better?- -Much better, and it is a great advantage to them in that and many other
ways.
1475. You say you hope to so extend your staff of inspectors as to do it all?—I think there will be cer tain branches we shall never do. Electricity, I doubt if we shall ever do, because that moves so fast and is so special that our work would not be enough to keep a good electrical inspector in modern practice. There may be other branches we can never take on, but we are now doing something like 80 per cent. of all the work that is inspected, and no doubt that will in crease. We also have to some extent to negard the position of one or two of our former inspectors. There is one man in particular who took on his office and started to some extent-he was a former resident engineer on one of the Colonial railways on our promises, and we are to some extent bound to keep him in a certain amount of work. That, of course, will go, and we shall gradually absorb nearly all.
1476, (Sir Ralph Mour.) Then the position practi- cally is that formerly you employed principally out- side inspectors, and that you did not accept responsi- hility Entirely.
1477. But you have found it advisable of Inte years to adjust that and organise a staff of your own inapee- tors, and to accept responsibility for their work?--Yes.
1178. In a case where your own inspectors inspect the material, and it is found to be faulty on delivery. who pays? We should, undoubtedly; am glad to say that a direct case of the kind has not arisen, but we take all responsibility provided it is satisfactorily established that the fault is with the inspection.
1479. In the case of an outside inspector, who pays then -The Colony.
A5 the
1480, (Mr. Gibson.) Qua the Colony, surely that is very unsatisfactory. You say these.outside people are your agents, but qua the Colony you are their agents; and it is immaterial to the Colony whether you employ a permanent or outside establishment 7-You have to look at the position supposing there were no joint institution such
Crown Agents. Supposing the Colony had to make its own arrange- ments for the purchase of stores, what would it do? I would employ some man who would act as agent. for a salary, no doubt, who would do the best he eoul, but he would not undertake financial responsi bility, having taken every precaution to select a com- petent engineer, for the acts of that engineer,
1481. I do not think the analogy is quite sound there. You are the appointed agents accepted by the Colony and by the Secretary of State, and your offier has to do certain work of inspection. Is it not the caso that you appoint a permanent staff of your own for which you accept responsibility?—Yes.
1182. You draw a distinction between the outside in- sporters, who are appointed for the job, and your own, but personally I do not think the distinction qua the Colonies can be maintained, and I think you are equally responsible for the acts and omissions of your temporary staff who are selected by you.
1483 (Chuimus.) The reason the Committee are so interested in this is that they have heard the saun View expressed by Sir Ernest Blake, and no doubt it has occurred to every member of the Committe that
MINUTES OF EVIDENCE.
Major M. A. Cameron, C.M.G.
from the point of view of the Colony it is so odd that if they order from you one day such things as your inspectors can inspect, you say that you will send them, and if they are not what they want you will be responsible, while, if the same Colony another day sends you an order for, say, electrical goods, you
to them, "Yes, we will send them to you, but if they are not what you want you must put up with it." Why We know you take so much interest in your work that you do not mini us putting these dilemmas you see the difficulty; it is a difficulty which has arisen out of our taking on a responsibility which we did not bear before; but to extend that and say, Because you have once begun to make yourself re sponsible for certain things, therefore you must sud- denly become responsible for all the others," seems to
stretching of the advantages which already giving to the Colonies by the establishment of our inspection branch.
We are
1181. It seems hard to them that for wooden houses they should get what they want, while for electrical machinery they should have to take what they can get?--You put it in that way, but in fact these posi- ttons very rarely arise, and 1 do not think the logicality is apparent to the Colonies because they have so little opportunity of putting the two things side by side; it is not a practical difficulty.
1485, (Mr. Trathes,) I think you are paid by per centages on the purchase of stores?—The office in.
14sti. Is the percentage the same in the three cases, first, if the goods are inspected by the Crown Agents' own agenta; secondly, if they are inspected by outside inspectors; and, again, if they are not inspected at all--The inspection is separately paid for, it is not covered by the purchasing commission.
1487. You get the commission equally whether you have inspected the goods through your own inspectors er through outside inspectors -It makes no difference. 1488. (fr. Bailey.) It costs the Colony more, do I murderstand, if you employ outside inspectors?—No, the scales are all the same.
1489. Whether you take those fees yourself directly or whether you hand on those fees, or part of them, to the outside inspectors?--Yes, it is in the memoran- dum 1 sent in; there is a scale laid down by the Secretary of State which we are authorised to charge, and that was exactly the scale which we were pre- ously paying to the outside inspectors. We took it on at the same rates.
1190. What I want to make quite sure of is this- that the Colony does not pay any more for you to. employ on their behalf an outside inspector 7-No, it nakes no difference, and if we do not inspect there is no payment by the Colony for inspection. They only pay if the goods are inspected.
1491. (Mr. Gibson.) With regard to the division of work amongst the Crown Agents under which Sir Ernest Blake practically manages the African and Chinese railways, in that to be a permanent arrange- ment? Is it an advantageous arrangement that some radways should be controlled directly by one Crown Agent and the bulk of them by another No arrange. ut of that kind is permanent; they have to be reconsidered from time to time. It is partly a matter of equally dividing the amount of work, and has grown up gradually. Sir Montagu Ommanney used To the West African Railways, and when he left the office Sir Ernest Blake took it on.
1402. You think on the whole it would be an advan- tag if all the work in connection with railways were done under one head ?-No, I am not prepared to say that necessarily.
1493. (Mr. Leuthes.) If that wen so, what would happen if the railway man were away-everything would have to stop -The head of the engineering department. Major Carmichael has the whole of the strings in his hands
1494. (Chairman.) Of all the railways ?--Yes, so that h has got it quite in his mind to secure continuddy.
1495. (Mr. Gibson.) There was one point with regard to the firms. One witness said that he considered your lists were too limited-take the case of locomotives-, but I gather from what you say to-day that any com-
69
2 July 19099.
petent firm can get on your list on application --Any firm that can show it is competent comes on the list.
1406. You have no restriction practically 7-No restriction whatever as to numbers. I may say that what we do when a firm applies is that we make them give us references; we then find out all we can about them from the references and then we send one of our inspectors to go over their works and see for him- self what they are good for.
1497. It is practically the procedure in force at the War Oflice, Admiralty and India Office?—Yes; I believe to.
14. With regard to the technical staff of your office, in the Works Department and the Enginering
Department they are all appointed. I take it. by the Crown Agents ?--Yes.
1499. Specially selected men?--All the technical Inen are selected.
1500. And the salaries of the special technical staff, like the rest of the staff of the Crown Agents, are subject to the control of-the Crown Agents -Y.
1501, (Chairman.) I have been requested to ask you whether you deal considerably, or at all, with the larger financial aspects of the office. say with the loans-Not personally.
1502. We gathered not. but we just wanted to be sure you have more the expert and technical side?— Yes. Of course we discuss the financial matters to- gether, but I do not directly deal with them.
1503. That is not your particular Department which you are most interested in ?--No.
1501. We have heard a good deal of that from Sig Ernest Blake and we shall hear more. We have asked all these questions which you have answered most fully ---and we are extremely obliged to you as you have been a great help to us this morning-with a view to as a Committee, ascertaining what judgment we should form as to how far it is advisable to bring the Crown Agents' Office more on to the permanent Civil Service side or lines, and whether the staff should be brought more into harmony with the Civil Service con- ditions. I should like to ask you these two questions: firstly, with regard to the larger aspects of the work to be done, whether you think it would give greater or lesa satisfaction if the Crown Agents were a Depart ment of State, and secondly, with regard to the staff, whether you think you could recruit a more efficient staff, and that they would be more contented, if they were brought more into line with the Civil Service. Will you please answer number one first, as to giving satisfaction to the Colonies and to the business com- munity-I think that, to make the Crown Agents a Department of State, would not by popular with the Colonies. The tendency of the Colonies, and that was expressed by Sir Frank Swettenham particularly in his reply to Mr. Chamberlain's circular of inquiry, and it has been expressed to me by a good many men besides, is to coniplain sometimes that the 'rown Agents are too much identified with the Colonial Office as it is. They complain that the Crown Agents have the ear of the Colonial Office, no to speak: it 19 not the case we know, but that is the idea, and that they are not in the position of agents; they say that "Our agents should be our servants to carry out our instructions.**
1505. More like the Agent General of a self-govern- ing colony-Yes; to do what we tell them." "There fore, to identify them with the Colonial Office still more, or to make them a Department of the Imperial Government, would. I think, intensify that feeling very much. We should in fact cease to be their servants. My own view is that the more we are the servants of the Colonies, and the more we act in that empacity. the less friction there is likely to bo with them, and that is what we endeavour to do. Wo try to settle all our points directly with them as much as possible. We do not appeal to the Serre- tary of State if we can possibly help it, nor do they. and in fact the cases where reference is necessary are How very few. To identify us with the Imperial Government would, I am afraid, make the position very unsatisfactory to the Colonies from that point
of view.
Reference :-
COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH-NOT TO
BE REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHIC-
---MISSION OF THE