Li Salehaus
fyre should I think see the sestien a 6
2
bother? allernative courses of action purposse
wills
верт
Muless you
༡༦་
i ho 3
any lyal objecten Jam disfired to ague that, with wis we shouls
wishe встрия
ари
agree litter I-th- fost preceding, as snoposed ho'd & the oft Bill auwred kit complinth
a comment on the bries of
A
بیجار
6/10
Thi Wallaces humaniti
• Boy hittills mom?
*
olur.
m2 Sibbs them
is have discussed this. It news
"
To we that the invention
this awandement
of the
X [en the Grohmance would create
important obligation
as a condition on
which
granted
what the concorsion of wo
in asendance with which it is operated
(vide xes +3
a
of the
case
the Ontwance 9 of 19257). Pranamatly referral of compliance with
requation under the proponed reation 55 A would have to be met by some Find
of action otherwine thin order would be maffective (Faufponerection 45 or 46 (or both) of the Bromance would be uworked. The Company winglet wall complain that to legulate in this way
To something vary much like a breast of contract introdusal after the agreement under which
the Степянками
двай
на домб
granted, & colieke because
X it is barbation they are powerless to prevent
Ithink wast
go back & put it to the Journon Tobnance in pares of public
objection mig let be rained. The despatah might
Page 10Page 11