Imed.
153 To Govenor Hongkong. Most med
15: To Secretary of State
N°241
Brif N°41 (Cotal N°2 Pr.1)
155 7.0. Note by of Atlee to Chinese Ambassador
18/2
14.2:58:
24.(..
156 7.0, F.2286/1325/10. - Embassy Chungking to Chinese Minister - 24.1.48
157.7.0. No 100
-Tel to Nanking
42.48
150 Tal N°120
Nanking
te f.o.
3.248
159 Tel No 121
Nanking to F-O.
3.2:48
Tel N° 122 Nanking to fo.
4.2.48
16 F.o. Tel
No 139
to Nanking
14.4.468
10x Tel No 163
Nanking to
F.o.
163 Tel N°224 to God.
Repeat of N° 160 Nanki; to Fo.
ула
15.2.48
16+ Tal N°227 15 Gou
Repeat of Fo. N° 136 to Nanking
1$-2-48
165 Tel N° 228 Fo
Hola Tel N° 170
You - Repeat of Fice N° 139 to Nanking
Nanking to Fio.
15·2.48
16!2.48
167 F.O.
ud
108 Fo.
F 2086/154/10 - Note Naulaing to China Dept Fo. F2274/239/10
2002
5.0. letter Scarlett to Mayle
anost ummediate tel.
169 Hong Kong (unched) most-
241.48
16.2.48
19.2.48
see (170)
I understand from Mr. Scarlett that there is
a telegram in from Nanking reporting on the meeting between the Ambassador and the Chinese Minister for Foreign Affairs on the 18th February, referred to in paragraph 2 of Nanking telegram at No.166. The gist of this telegram is that the Foreign Minister pressed for the Garden to be put under the sole control of the Chinese. The Ambassador then made the compromise proposal for a joint Committee, which the Minister for Foreign Affairs promised to think over. I believe, however, that the telegram indicates that the prospects of Chinese agreement to the Garden of Remembrance, even with the compromise proposal as regards control, are not very bright.
I understand that the Ambassador is anxious to be placed in a position to put a draft joint
announcement