18
}
2917..
R. Huds
848
to take it where I would not send for it. I told Izen
to take it away, and it was returned.
Nr Fung Wa Chun:-
$10 was sent to you ?
9.3679
3
25
A.
It was sent to my house at 28 Leighton Hill Road, and
whoever came with it, I did not see, as I was not in
at the time. It was in an envelope, no writing or
anything on it.
94
Q.
You could not trace it ?
23194
A.
I could not trace it.
What became of that $10 ?
23595
A.
I have got it now.
Q.
23
Did you hand it to the Sanitary Board ?
A.
I did not hand it to anybody.
The Chairman:-
Was money ever sent to you through the port ?
23577
A.
Nothing, Sir, only by Mr Hynde, who is on the Sanitary Board now. I lent him an amount of $200.
98
A.
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
GO. 537
I mean presents of money.
Never.
23598
23599
Because it is said that certain sums, not large sums,
have been sent to you through the post.
37
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH-
COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO SE
A.
I have never received it.
by o
23.
Er Shelton Hooper:-
You are quite sure that the $10 sent to you
did not
23.620
arrive through the post ?
A.
No, Sir.
07 Ro
How as it addressed ♥
A
To R. Hudson.
02.0.
No stamp ?
23607
25.602
A.
No, Sir.
7603
Mr Humphreya!-
63
A.
You said in your evidence that in connection with this Tai Hang village affair, you did not think there was anything wrong until about a fortnight after that interpreter left, and then you made use of the expresss
ion "everything pointed to that" •
That was the morning before he left.