1.8
!
}
Mr Shelton Hooper:-
23.288
2882.
gave the order then that 40 goolies he employed at
once,
812
and ar English speaking foremar. provided. These
40 coolims were not put in the District, and the
English speaking foreman was not provided. Then a week
before I left the District, probably agout 5 weeks
after that report, I sent in another report to the
Senior Inspector, and I asked if the order of the
M. 0. H. re the English speaking foreman had been
rescinded, as the man was not yet in the District.
You applied to the M. 0. H. who ordered 40 coolles 23 288
and an English speaking foreman. Then you go on to say
these were not provided ?
Yes, Sir.
Therefore the report of the M. 0. H. in disobeyed $22 289
A.
992.
A.
Yes.
Who by
23298
A.
The Senior Inspector got the order.
៩
And he refused to carry it out?
23291
A.
The order was not carried out.
Ware the coolims paid for ?
23242
The Chairman:-
A.
I could not tell you, Sir.
Mr Shelton Hooper:-
23.273
A.
Could you tell us why the coolies were not provided "
The order was to proviâs an English speaking foreman
and 40 coolies "this morning", Inspector Fisher.
Inspector Fisher asked me if the coolies had been
The Chairman:-
94
A.
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
GO. 537.
37
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
there. I said the refuse had been removed, hut the side
channels were not done. The work had been done by the
existing staff, the staff of coolies which the sub
contractor had.
And the extra men ordered had not been provided ? 13294
No.-
23295.
Supposing the extra men had been provided, and they
were to be paid for, would it be your duty to sign the
order to say that the men had been used ↑