ļ
-2593.
Dr. Chauth:
475
he might lose one fifth of the value of his property,
A.
I would not like to say the proportions
He might lose a considerable proportion,
a fifth ?
·
20924 perhaps not
Oh yes.
20925-
209240
A.
Yr Humphreys: -
26
Quita enough to handicap him in an ordinary transaction
with regard to the property ?
Presiahly.
20726
Now, in connection with this section 175, I would like
to touch upon one question, which I overlooked before.
Under the ordinance of 1899, practically the same law
existed in ragard to open spaces as in the Ordinance of
1903. I think it is 30, - word for word almost, - but
thers was this very important difference that it was
qualified by other clauses which modified its effect in
regard to buildings subsequently erected to that date.
That is, to 1399.
·
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
ויוןויון
Reference:-
CO. 537
A.
Уев.
Q.
In the 1903 Ordinancs,
-
27
20927
when the ordinance was
analgamated in 1903, all these qualifications or
modifications were deleted, but the original clause
regarding open spaces was left in in its entirety. The
result of that has been that houses erected between
1899 and the passing of the Health Aot in 1903 are not
allowed any of those modifications, which it was
intended they should have had under the 1899
Ordinance, and that is just the same as if they were
insanitary houses erected prior to 1899.
A.
Yes.
28
And if that was not an oversight,
**720
-
I take it, it was
an oversight, that it was not intended to be so, - but
I take it if it was intended to be so, I think it is a
matter for the Commission to draw attention to; why a
building,presumably a sanitary building, completed in
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
✔RODUCED
37