X22
1841.
859
a en tu
I am sure
and we could turn it rig over without destroying that
block.
A.
All I can say is, that you were fortunate.
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
سية لسكا
1526620
A.
67
Q.
A.
it was not the same block, because there was no block
left.
15.266
That I cant say definitely, but it was the same house, because we opened up the 16 houses, and then we had the greatest difficulty to get even the corner off
with a pick. It required two or three blows.
You were very fortunate. I have never found such good
1 ime concrete yet.
16267
You have heard that Er Chatham went and saw it. Did
you see his report ?
No, I have seen one or two reports. What I saw WAB the proceedings of the Sanitary Board Meeting. I dont
think I have read over the Sanitary Board papers.
Reference:-
HC.O. 537
36
NOT TO BE
COPYRIGHT PHONICALLY WITH-
REPRODUCED
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC
Do you think that the conorate has ever set ?
68 0.
·
Most interesting you should have read it.
A,
вд
69 20
A.
A.
15768
I do, although I am not here to answer questions. 15269
I de I consider that they had set in the firet
place, and not become disintegrated, for some inches
from the top had not become disintegrated at all. I and
not saying four inches from the top.
That comes back to the question I have been fighting fo too high a standard.
152770
Not too high a standard, but what I am coming to it
whether we shall for the future consider it a Sanitary Inspector's duty to condemn a floor, where he
finds it two thirds c the thickness impervicus.
That is ex... tly how we stand at the present time. At prevent, there fr standard for new work only, but no
Officer or ti Sanitary Department knows how he stands
Page 685Page 686