Ber
ما
#d
!_
the Chairm150 2 <
fitness? ❤
1782
A Beste I
799
And I have got *if it is 600 cubic feet, it would legally accomodate 12 people", That is obviously wrong. I should have said square foot, And also in the next sentance, I am saying *the law wants 50 cubic feet for sach person". The law really wants 50 square feet for
sach person.
Question 13833. There is a blank at the end of the
answer,
which ends "which in 20 years henos would be".
I meant *20 years hence would be condamned as very
unsanitary".
I remember that.
In the next answer,
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
། ། །། ན། ། ..............................O. 537
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
the ChairmaN ! *
།
Witness?”
at speaking of "l† times the
sime of the street". That I meant was the width of the
street.
In my next answer, I dont noun thab people should not be allowed to build houses there. I mean that houses should not be built, exseyt nångtid to the wants of the people, who are to live there,
Question 13838, It appeared to me when I was reading this through, that that was not ay miswer, but that it was a remark made by yourwwif (Kr Chairmans). That is my remark distinctly, béösuhe that is what I have had in my mind all along.
Immediately following that is a quietion, "but Chinese house pays better than a Burapean one".
Ir Sholton Hoaper:- That is mine.
The Chairman)-
We will alter that, becsum that sertainly is
said most distinstly. There was no answer to that, and
Mr Hoeger put his question.
Page 1658, bottom of the page, "I tried to raise my vajos once, and I was told to attend to my em dųsizess"
You said that quite distinssly.
A
Page 625Page 626
4