t
جا
..
1711.
14415 4.
so milan that they do not inquire doing
727
14.415
A.
Yes, it properly done in the first place.
14.416
Kr Humphr@yat”
16
You said that it would ha a good thing for all tenement houses to be limewashed twité a year. On what growa,
•
that it would be do you say it would be a good thing better to do it twice a year. Do you suppose for one
moment that it is any good as regards plague ?
A.
All experts have said so. I have not analysed.
'7
I think experts opinions differ a good deal ?
A.
18
A.
All technical books say limewash is a good thing.
For plague ?
14.417
14418
Not as againet plague, but 1: a ranitary covering to a
wall.
14419
19
How do you account for 45 per cent of germs. If it is good stuff, that ought not to be.
A.
Yes.
14420
10
You have been in business a good many years in Hongkong, Mr Leam. Do you think there is any advantage in putting
year. house owners to the expense of limewashing twice a beyond the fact that by compelling him to limewash twice a year everything is cleaned out. I think we
admit that is an advantage.
The Chairman:-
27
A.
If done properly, I would say that once a year would be
quite sufficient.
My question is whether getting aside the advantage lo which accrues from having everything cleared out of the house, everything moved, and all the corners swept and garnished, beyond that there is any advantage from
ใน
a public health point of view, by putting it on twice
instead of onas 1
So, I dont think so.
145
Is there my further advantage do you think, apeskir. from a professional polat of view, if not from a
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537
36
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON
OUT PERM1591ON OF THE PUBLIC
REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH
COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE