ما
Charmain
1367490
A.
7607%
que Penise
منه
621
нужно
And if you could not apply it to a house, could not apply it to a modern passenger ship ?
the
13674
Unln you are able to close up all the openings in loon and cabins and fill the ship up with this gas, you could not guarantee to disinfect it, but in a ship, by furigating with the Clayton apparatus, there is not doubt you can kill a large number of rats. But do you realise a modern passenger ship cargo boat is like a tin bath - you can fill that up
13675
+
an ordinar
to the top in a modern passenger ship, you hav: your tin bath, and on top of that you have a three or four tiered structure, more difficult to make airtight than
75mm Q.
■ Chinese house, and the rats are in that part, the passengers and food are.
where
A.
It depends on the nature of the building or ship, you intend to disinfect, as to whether you are to waste
your money, or use it properly.
which
13676
Lau Chu Pak:-
76
The Chairman:-
77
Lau Chu Pak:-
A.
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537
Was it notin 1903 than $80,000 was spent upon fumigat-
ion 7
About $30,000 was spent in chloride of lime.
Yes,
I have read the figures, $33,000, meely.
That was a very expensive experiment, wasnt it?
13677
It was not an experiment at all. It was undertaken with
the avowed intention of disinfecting. You cant call
an operation extending over six months and
costing
$80,000 an experiment.
78
Q.
Do you consider all the money was wasted.
13878
A.
୮
Er Fung wa Ohun:-
71
36
I consider the greater part of it wis metered
absolutely wasted.
13674
Don't you think that the M. 0. H. should go out as ofte ni
ma pomɛible to see that the Inspectors and their men
are carrying out his instructions properly.
Which Inspectors are j
· «ferring to ↑
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE