=
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537
35
OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO DE
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON
Ai-
The Chairn -
1609
A:-
The Chairman :-
10 Chu Pak 1-
1670
A:-
Pung Wa Chun :-
1678
A:-
279
Mr. Woodcock a
I told the President that it was rumoured that this man waS in partnership with the small stores contractor and it is of course laid down in the Government regulations that Govern- -Dent servants shall not be engaged in trading and I think the idou of the President in sending it up to the Police was
that the Policyshould go and examine this Man Ring's books
to see whether this Lo Han Kai was in partnership.
When was all this done ?
It was done this morning.
1669
( made a statement briefly to the afect that a number of charges had been made against Lo Han Kai in connection with various Government contracts, that the matter had been under
consideration by the Members of the Commission for the past
two weeks, that every effort had been made to keep the matter
entirely private and that no communioɑtion had consequently been made to anyone with the exception of the Colonial
Secretary and the Attorney General, that it was necessary therefore to inmediately take steps to prevent the Captain Superintendent of Police from making any move in the matter and that the Chairman, in consultation with the Colonial
Secretary and the Attorney General, decide what action to take in view of the disappearance of Lo Man Kai.)
kundd
A
Inspector McKensie said it was commonly reported among the 1670
Sanitary Inspectors ?
I am not quite sure of what he said but he left me under
that impression, that it was common talk among the Inspector
That his exact words were I can't may.
When did you take him out on the verandah and speak to him shŋi
about it ?
On Saturday morning there was a meeting of the Inspectors
and Dr Macfarlane told me Inspector Hokensie was on the
.
.