bat
93.
95
Clark
573
has to do with the Public Works Departront,
Sheltan Hogperi- Bu! that is the point. They are testing cement and what
AI-
I do say is that they have passed work that has been abso- -lutely bad and was capable of being found bad on amerfi-
-cial inspection. I will apply it to Inapactor L sebel,
you think he is qualified to judge ?
Do
I think he is sufficiently qualified to enable hir to dis-
-tinguish good cement from bad cement Lubel I an speaking
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
TTILLICO. 537
35
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH-
COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
of.
Csiruan
:-
514
At-
At-
There are one or two other questions I want to ask you. One 574
is about supervision of drains Section 190 to 198, Not of
course, the supervision of drains in a very important
suction of the Sanitary Onlinance. Which men of the Sanitary
Department are told off to check plans re the laying and
construction of drains ?
One of the Sanitary Survapora, Nt Bryan. He chocks the plans
and there are two drainage Inspectors working under him.
What qualifiction has Mr Bryan for such work ?
I don't know that he has got any particular lettema to his
nane that I can't quote but he is a man of considerable
experience at Home.
516 - In drain laying ?
As- Drainage work I suppose.
There did he acquire his experience ?
And brea
In England, Ideer under Mr Orook. He came out as assistant
surveyor Bola six or seven years ago. He came to the Public
Torks Department and was turned over to the Sanitary Depart-
-ment. There was a muddle, Re was to nome to the Sanitary
Department but his actus) agreement, was sale out to the
Public Work Departmentand he was turned over immediately to
up. He was selected by Mr Chadwick at Home and was appoint- -ed
575
576
577
Page 95Page 96