The Secretary:-
The Chairman:-
The secretary: -
The Chairman:-
The Secretary:-
The Chairman:-
2335.
214
Yes, the owner was fined originally and Man Lee Yuen
was fined.
He was fined for that ?
He had to pay the fine.
Was he summoned ?
He was not summoned, but he had to pay the fine,
I did not know the owner was fined twice. This is new
to me.
Ar Shelton Hooper:-
The Chairman:-
Mr shelton Hooper:-
The Chaincan :-
For what offence was he fined ?
For failing to properly construct hoods and fluss.
Apparently, the owner was fined for that. Apparently he
em.loyed Man Lee Yuen, who, a month later, was fined
for the same thing. Mr Blood says, I understand, that
the work was in accordance with the plan, and in
accordance with the Ordinancé, and they spend from that
time up to December in corresponding with the Sanitary
Board, asking what was the matter. These are two
notices for fining, and they were fined on representat-
ion of Mr Lamble, who was the Inspector.
The second was, for not complying with the Magistrate's
order.
But Mr Blood understandsthat né further work was made,-
that the work was in accordance with the plan, or
Ordinance.
Kr Shelton Rooper:-
18884
I was thinking whether, between the time before Kr
Flood went and saw it, the man had not complied with
199 844
the notice. It does not take many days to comply with a
notice like that. But he told you, he had done it
before he got the suKROTI B.?
Witness:-
Yes.
I
Witness ratiras.
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
HGO. 537.
37
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH-
COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE