}

01

لے

16.691

bleadmann

A.

2058.

1080

fr arlenum En

Eufferance the nuisance arises or continues, or if such

person cannot be found, on the owner or occupier of the

premises on which the nuisance arises requiring him to

abate the same within a reasonable time to be specified

in the notice, and to execute such work and do such

things as may be necessary for that purpose is." - "the

Board shall", and the Board deputes certain officers to

de that work.

16.691

quite. Would you consider it in order if an Inspector

handed the notice either to an interpreter or foreman

to serve ?

I think it ought to be served by an Inspector.

16.692

You would not approve of it, supposing I could tell that

they were served by a coloured foreman or interpreter ?

A

I would not say it was irregular.

939.

No, but inadvisable ?

A.

Inadvisable.

Mr Shelton Hooper:-

94

A.

The Chairman:-

A.

96

A.

Yes, as much as possible.

Q.

16693

16.694

You are not aware that the Board have made any rules'?'

I think they have.

But you think they should be served by a responsible

European officer ?

It depends on how far that would be practicable. There

are so many notiɑss to serve.

But as much as possible ↑

16696

responni1695-

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

wwwwwww....C.O. 537

DE

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY M

COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRA~ AOT TO TH

Now, what do you think of altering the wording of the

printed part of the notice. Dont you think that any

alteration in the notice should be initialled by the

person who sims it, to shew that it has been made befær e

it was signed, and not afterwards ? I will put a case

to you where the words "ņake good" have been struck out

and the word "reaoncrete" put in.

Share This Page