نا
2025.
if he were never in the office, and enough for andther
if he was never out of the office ?
A.
There is quite sufficient.
164.81.
A.
16.487
Like a detective who might be everywhere supervising ?
Yes.
And it would exercise a wholesome control over the 16.482 Inspector, and if there were any pomplaints such as we haveheard of little short of blackmail, perhaps if there was on the spot a man in his position, dont you think it would be for the smoother working of the · Ordinance, particularly with the Chinese ?
16.483
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537
36
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
And another thing, the Inspectors are not always there. They leave it entirely to the coolies and foremen.
Yes.
د
Do you think, going on with what Mr Hooper said just 16484- now, that there is enough technical correspondence to require a Medical man in the office the whole day?
A.
Yes.
Mr Lau chu Pak:-
૨.
¿
A.
The Chairman:-
९५
A.
No, certainly not.
83 Qoi
B
A.
16uss-
Could a great deal of it not be done by the Secretary?
I dont think it is necessary to have a M. 0. H. in the
office the whole day.
Statistical work,
16487
- has he not got a great deal of that,
Mr Shelton Hooper:-
A.
No.
૧.
A.
88
Q.
A
Could not a great deal of that be done by the Secretary 1
16.487
They have altered it, since I have been at home. There
was a chief clerk, they have altered that now, and I
·
think the chief olerk is senior olerk in the Secretary,s
office. I had a European.
Would it not be a good thing to have that man back 16488
again?
You.