!
1988.
Mr. Horjul.
Dr Athemin Erd
1009
substituted therefor, and read a first time on 7th November 1902 ?
A.
I cant remember those dates.
16.226
Q.
I dont expect you to. I only want to get the dates 220 chronologically.
A.
21
Q.
That was the first reading of No 1 of 1903, I think. Yes, it was, but that took the place of the Bill that/622| was withdrawn.
-
A.
Yes, I believe that that was so, but it does not say so here though.
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
CO. 537
22
..
No, but it says it was read the first time. Now, the /6222" present Ordinance, I will call it the principal
-
I
Ordinance, I an dealing now with No 1 of 1903, think was assented to by the Governor as an Ordinance
on 21st February 1903. Have you got the date in that
book'?
I have got it here, 21st February 1903, Jõua
A.
23 9.
I think the notification of the non dissalowance by the
16223
King of this Ordinance is dated the -
A.
26th August 1903.
24
Q.
Now up to that date,
A.
16224
this last date, -the Ordinance
had been working practically eight months. Did you
find it at all unworkable, and requiring amendment ? Between February and this ?
16225
Well, from the time it came into force until that date?
A.
Yes, I thought it might be improved upon.
In what respect ?
16226
A.
Well, in many respects.
Q.
Will you name some of them ?
16227
A.
Yes. - of scurce, they have been amended so much, it is diffult
36
28 Q.
Perhaps I might assist you a bit with this copy. The i6128)
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE MI