Cleartisans

1939.

Dr Clack Ent

15-942-90

>

959

I do think that a good deal of good results. As it is

carried out now, it tends to keep the house cleaner. It

undoubtedly makes them lighter, and in both those

respects, it conduces to the health of the inmates,

Do you think it would as well if it was done once a 16.942

year instead of twice ↑

Would you still recommend it twice a year ?

Yes.

A.

Not with chinese tenants.

43 Q.

A.

Shelton Hooper:-

44

A.

45-

Q.

A.

46

Q.

15.943

And would you go so far as to include every Chinese 15.944

tenant ?

No, that is why the law allows exemption to be granted.

Only yesterday I saw some houses, and I recommended

certain parts,They had not touched the walls, and I did

not tell them to do it because they were reasonably

clean.

This was at Wanchai.

15.945

Dont you think Dr Clark, try for a mucent to be quite

un#fficial, but to put the common sense view on it,

trying to arrive at what is best for tia community,

Hongkong dont you think that certain Districts :

could be exempt from biennial whitawening, making it

only so that those Chinese tenements world be done once

a year, and in certainDistricts the lower class houses

twice a year. Dont you think you could take a map and

lay out Districts ?

15.946

No, I dont think I could take a map and lay out Dis-

tricts, I do think I couldpay personal visits, and allot certain blooks of houses for yearly limewashing.

I meant to give you an instance of what is in my mind,

from Murray Barracks to Pottinger Street in Queens Road.

Well, I would not exempt that block all the way through.

Taks all the left hand houses going wast, what houses

A.

Q.

47

do you think ?

16047

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

C.O. 537

36

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON

OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH – NOT TO BE

Share This Page