-
897
913
Chake Hoke Honigsh
7293
Xr Shelton Hooper:-
That $250 was for the houses in Bonham Strand West? 10
7293
or 14 houses, was it not?
A
I think so.
7294
And the $50 was for the house in Wing Lok Street ?
7294
A.
I dont remember exactly
Kr Lau chu Pak;-
The stall opposite ?
7245
A.
You
7296 2
When that hole was opened up, you saw the concrete. It 7=46 was in good condition, was it not ↑
As
I dont remember exactly. The Inspector said it was.
Qo
724
Well, but you saw it. You know whether it was good or 7247 bad. You are a contractor.
A.
Well, they are all about the same
•
even if it is very
Yr Shelton Hooper:
7298
A.
The Chairman;-
7297
good. They are all about the same, because you see it
is damp there on account of the tide.
Do you think it was so bad that the Inspector ought 7198
have ordered it to be reconcreted, or was it a good
enough stone ?
They had been a long time -
some 10 years. I say that
lime concreting that length of time would be about the
same as that.
Well now, with regard to that $50 payment, how did you 7149 get the money from the Tuen Fat Hong ↑ There was $50
paid for those two houses in Bonham Strand and Wing Lok
Street.
Probably that did not pass through my hands. Passed through whose hands then ?
7300
A
Mr Jung Wa Chun;-
7300
A
Kok Hon Shun's perhaps.
\...e "chairman:-
7307
The money was paid to Mok Hon Shun. I know that. But 730/
did not Mok Hon Shun pay the money over to you,
Ave
afterwards ↑
Yes, that is the way I did.
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537.
35
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON
OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC
REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
Page 405Page 406