64250
Q1-
B. Pearce Exe
819
6425-
But not meaning dishonesty, perhapa. Supposing you
heard that a Senior Inspector was taking no notice of official reports made by a District Inspector, would you call that should you think that a sufficient ground to shift, or not to investigate further ?
A:-
At-
6426 Q8-
I dont remember.
I should endeavour to investigate it, if I had time. Have you ever had such a charge made ?
6426
6417 01-
Have you ever investigated one?
6427
A:-
Not that I know of.
he Chairman:~64 28
You would probably remember if such a question were put to you. It is rather an unfortunate matter, isnt
it ?
6425
A:-
Yea,
it is rather unfortunate.
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537
35
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON
$SION OF THE PUBLIC PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH
COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
6429080
A:-
6450 03-
A:-
6431Q3-
Shelton Hooper:-
6452
It would be rather a serious reflection upon the way inbxzq
which the Senior Inspector was carrying out his work,
especially within the last year ↑
I expect it would, but I really have such an enormous amount of trifling things to go through.
Rut this would hardly be trifling. Supposing a District 6430 Inspector made such a charge against his chief, it could not be trifling, and you investigated it, and found that he was in the habit of pigeonholing certain reports which it was his duty to forward to the Sanitary Department, or that it was an unfounded charge against his Senior, it could not be trifling. One or the other would have to be punished ↑
I dont remember any definite charge.
It seems so to me. It is not a trifling matter. It is 643
a very serious charge.
You cannot say definitely that such a thing has happened. Such a thing may have happened ?
643
A1-
It may have happened, but I have no recollection,
Chairman #❤
As a matter of fact, we have got entirely separate
6433
6433