1932 — Page 518

Blue Books 香港計冊 All AI Reviewed

3.—Returns of Cases tried during the last Ten Years

Defendants, how disposed of

Year No. of Cases No. of Defendants Imprisoned with Hard Labour Imprisoned in Default of Fine Fine Forfeiture of Duty Reprimanded Sent Back to Pay Duty Discharged from Ship Dismissed Forfeiture of Gunpowder
1923 268 644 data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted
1924 392 1,006 data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted
1925 308 721 data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted
1926 303 720 data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted
1927 324 678 43 588 9 2 2 49 1 20 12
Total (1923–1927) 1,685 3,769 174 26 3,209 204 3 153
1928 380 685 10 15 619
1929 477 873 3 33 779
1930 792 1,269 1,139
1931 743 1,210 43 1,081
1932 487 846 12 38 724
Total (1928–1932) 2,879 4,883 25 27 193 4,342 114 207

Averages

Period Avg. Cases Avg. Defendants Imprisoned with Hard Labour Imprisoned in Default of Fine Fine Forfeiture of Duty Reprimanded Sent Back to Pay Duty
1st period (1923–1927) 337.0 753.8 34.8 5.2 641.8 40.8 0.6 30.6
2nd period (1928–1932) 575.8 976.6 5.4 38.6 868.4 22.8 41.4

Note: Detailed disposal figures for individual years 1923–1926 and several columns for 1928–1932 are illegible in the OCR source and marked as corrupted or omitted (…).

Edit History

2026-07-15 09:17:06 · NVIDIA / nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
3.—Returns of Cases tried during the last Ten Years Defendants, how disposed of Year No. of Cases No. of Defendants Imprisoned with Hard Labour Imprisoned in Default of Fine Fine Forfeiture of Duty Reprimanded Sent Back to Pay Duty Discharged from Ship Dismissed Forfeiture of Gunpowder 1923 268 644 data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted 1924 392 1,006 data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted 1925 308 721 data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted 1926 303 720 data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted data corrupted 1927 324 678 43 588 9 2 2 49 1 20 12 Total (1923–1927) 1,685 3,769 174 26 3,209 … 204 3 153 … … 1928 380 685 10 15 619 … … … … … … 1929 477 873 3 33 779 … … … … … … 1930 792 1,269 … … 1,139 … … … … … … 1931 743 1,210 … 43 1,081 … … … … … … 1932 487 846 12 38 724 … … … … … … Total (1928–1932) 2,879 4,883 25 27 193 4,342 114 207 … … … Averages Period Avg. Cases Avg. Defendants Imprisoned with Hard Labour Imprisoned in Default of Fine Fine Forfeiture of Duty Reprimanded Sent Back to Pay Duty 1st period (1923–1927) 337.0 753.8 34.8 5.2 641.8 40.8 0.6 30.6 2nd period (1928–1932) 575.8 976.6 5.4 38.6 868.4 22.8 41.4 … Note: Detailed disposal figures for individual years 1923–1926 and several columns for 1928–1932 are illegible in the OCR source and marked as corrupted or omitted (…).
Baseline (Original)
Year. No, of cases. No, of defendants. Imprisoned with Larel labour. 3.—Returs of Cases tried during the last Ten Years, Defendants, how disposed of. Imprisone in default of fine. Imprison- ment with- Finel. Forfeiture of out hard labour. Reprimanded. Sent back to pay. du'y. To be discharged from ship. Dismisse:l Forfeiture of gunpowder. 1923, 268 644 1924, 392 1,006 1925, 308 721 1926, 303 720 ERS N 17 A 175 25 7 849 103 27 663 32 63-1 1927, 324 678 43 588 9 2 2 = 49 TV 1 20 12 11 20 28 14 24 Total,... 1,685 3,769 174 26 3,209 1 204 3 153 1928, 380 685 10 15 619 1029, 477 873 3 33 779 1930, 792 1,269 ] 6-1 1,139 1931, 743 1,210 I 43 1.081 1932, 487 846 12 38 724 EA 95 3 17 24 == 38 41 41 35 50 35 37 Total,... 2,879 4,883 25 27 193 4.342 114 207 Average of 1st period, 337.0 753.8 34.8 5.2 641.8 40,8 .6 30.6 Average of 2nd period, 575.8 976.6 5.4 38.6 868.4 22.8 41.4 516 818 (Y 12)
2026-07-15 09:17:06 · Baseline
View content

Year.

No, of cases.

No, of defendants.

Imprisoned with Larel labour.

3.—Returs of Cases tried during the last Ten Years,

Defendants, how disposed of.

Imprisone in default of fine.

Imprison- ment with-

Finel.

Forfeiture of

out hard labour.

Reprimanded.

Sent back

to

pay.

du'y.

To be discharged from ship.

Dismisse:l

Forfeiture of gunpowder.

1923,

268

644

1924,

392

1,006

1925,

308

721

1926,

303

720

ERS N

17

A

175

25

7

849

103

27

663

32

63-1

1927,

324

678

43

588

9 2 2 =

49

TV

1

20

12

11

20

28

14

24

Total,... 1,685

3,769

174

26

3,209

1

204

3

153

1928,

380

685

10

15

619

1029,

477

873

3

33

779

1930,

792

1,269

]

6-1

1,139

1931,

743

1,210

I

43

1.081

1932,

487

846

12

38

724

EA 95

3

17

24

==

38

41

41

35

50

35

37

Total,...

2,879

4,883

25

27

193

4.342

114

207

Average of

1st period,

337.0

753.8

34.8

5.2

641.8

40,8

.6

30.6

Average of

2nd period,

575.8

976.6

5.4

38.6

868.4

22.8

41.4

516

818

(Y 12)

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.