The user wants me to proofread OCR output of a historical table about vessels entered at Hong Kong ports in 1882. The text is a table with columns: NATIONALITY OF VESSELS, WITH CARGOES (Vessels, Tons, Crews), IN BALLAST (Vessels, Tons, Crews), TOTAL (Vessels, Tons, Crews). The OCR has many errors: misaligned columns, missing numbers, garbled characters, etc. I need to reconstruct the table in Markdown.
First, I need to parse the OCR text. It starts with "(S 6)" and "No. 3.-NUMBER, TONNAGE, and CREWS of VESSELS of EACH NATION ENTERED at Ports in the Colony of Hongkong, in the Year 1882." Then "ENTERED." Then column headers: "NATIONALITY OF VESSELS. WITH CARGOES. IN BALLAST. TOTAL." Then subheaders: "Vessels. Tons. Crews. Vessels. Tons. Crews. Vessels. Tons. Crews."
Then rows for each nationality. The OCR is messy. I need to extract data for each nationality.
Let's list nationalities from the text: American, Annamese, Austrian, British, Chinese, Chinese Junks, Danish, Dutch, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Norwegian, Portuguese, Russian, Siamese, Spanish, Swedish, TOTAL.
I need to reconstruct each row with three numbers for each of the three categories (With Cargoes, In Ballast, Total). The OCR often merges numbers or splits incorrectly.
I'll go through each nationality:
OCR: "American. 62 73,413 1,750 16 16.249 295 78 89,662 2.045"
Seems like: With Cargoes: 62 vessels, 73,413 tons, 1,750 crews. In Ballast: 16 vessels, 16,249 tons, 295 crews. Total: 78 vessels, 89,662 tons, 2,045 crews. The OCR has "16.249" likely 16,249. "2.045" likely 2,045. Good.
OCR: "Annamese, 1 136 19 1 136 19 2 272 38"
With Cargoes: 1, 136, 19. In Ballast: 1, 136, 19. Total: 2, 272, 38. Good.
OCR: "Austrian,.. 12 20,064 695 12 20,064 695"
Only two sets? Actually it shows "12 20,064 695" twice? The OCR: "Austrian,.. 12 20,064 695 12 20,064 695". That might be With Cargoes and In Ballast? But there should be three sets. Possibly In Ballast is zero? But the table shows "12 20,064 695" for With Cargoes and then maybe In Ballast is blank? However the OCR shows two identical sets. Could be that In Ballast is zero and Total same as With Cargoes. But the pattern: For Austrian, maybe there were no ballast entries. The OCR might have omitted the In Ballast column (maybe zeros). But the table has columns for In Ballast. The OCR shows "12 20,064 695 12 20,064 695". That could be With Cargoes and Total? But there should be three groups. Let's check other rows: British has three groups. Chinese has three groups. Chinese Junks has three groups. Danish has three groups. Dutch has two groups? Dutch: "20 18,158 1,018 : : 20 18,158 1,618". That seems like With Cargoes: 20, 18,158, 1,018. In Ballast: maybe zeros? Then Total: 20, 18,158, 1,618? But the crew total differs: 1,018 vs 1,618. That suggests In Ballast had some crews? Actually the OCR shows "20 18,158 1,018 : : 20 18,158 1,618". The colons might indicate missing data. Possibly In Ballast: 0 vessels, 0 tons, 600 crews? That doesn't make sense. Let's examine the original table structure: The table likely has columns: Nationality, With Cargoes (Vessels, Tons, Crews), In Ballast (Vessels, Tons, Crews), Total (Vessels, Tons, Crews). For each nationality, there should be 9 numbers (3x3). The OCR often misses some.
I need to reconstruct based on typical patterns. For nationalities with no ballast entries, the In Ballast columns would be zeros or dashes. The OCR might have omitted them.
Let's parse each row carefully.
I'll rewrite the OCR text with line breaks as given:
(S 6)
No. 3.-NUMBER, TONNAGE, and CREWS of VESSELS of EACH NATION ENTERED at Ports in the Colony of Hongkong, in the Year 1882.
ENTERED.
NATIONALITY
OF
WITH CARGOES.
IN BALLAST.
TOTAL.
VESSELS..
Vessels. Tons.
Crews. Vessels. Tons. Crews. Vessels. Tons. Crews.
American.
62 73,413 1,750
16
16.249
295
78
89,662 2.045
Annamese,
1
136
19
1
136
19
2
272
38
Austrian,..
12 20,064 695
12 20,064 695
British,
2,434 2,326,442 102,736
43
38,607
1,300
2,477 2,365,049 104,036
Chinesc,
120 121,480 5,960
1
13:13
25
127 121,872 5,985
Chinese Junks,
16,511 1,274,876 219,275
8,720 530,514 99,277
25,231 1,805,390 318,552
Danish,
57 33,625 1,264
3
1,824
G8
60
35,440 1,332
Dutch,
20
18,158 1,018
:
:
20
18,158 1,618
French,
127 173,092 11,998
H
127
173,692; 11,098
German,
382
247,575 7,901
21
12,204
438
403
259,869, 8,399
Italian,......
1
435
12
:
1
435
12
Japanese,..
32 32,630 2,371
:
32
Norwegian,
tl
9,650 330
Portuguese,.
132
18
:
.:.
32,830
2,371
2.8771
75
14
12.527
405
:
432
18
Russian,
17 13,432 4-48
2,490
132
19
15,931,
580
Sinmese,
24
11,204, 545
:
24
11.2041
Spanish,
9.701 1.299
3
2,276
121
36
12.067 1,420
Swedish,
+
1.330
42
:
4
1,330
42
TOTAL......
19.855 369,545 358,341
8.813
607,668 101,750
4.976.20
460,091This is messy. I need to interpret each nationality.
Let's start with the header: The table has columns: NATIONALITY OF VESSELS | WITH CARGOES (Vessels, Tons, Crews) | IN BALLAST (Vessels, Tons, Crews) | TOTAL (Vessels, Tons, Crews).
Now, for each nationality, there should be 9 numbers. The OCR often breaks lines. I'll try to reconstruct by matching numbers.
I'll go through each nationality:
American:
Annamese:
Austrian:
OCR: "Austrian,.. 12 20,064 695 12 20,064 695"
Only two groups. Possibly In Ballast is zero? But then Total would be same as With Cargoes. However the OCR shows two identical groups. Could be that the In Ballast column is empty (0) and the Total column is repeated? But the pattern for other nationalities: British has three groups. Chinese has three groups. Chinese Junks has three groups. Danish has three groups. Dutch has three groups? Let's see Dutch: "20 18,158 1,018 : : 20 18,158 1,618". That's three groups: first group (With Cargoes), second group (In Ballast) maybe zeros? But colons might represent zeros? Then third group (Total). For Austrian, maybe the In Ballast is zero and not shown? But the OCR shows two groups. Could be that the In Ballast group is missing and the second group is Total. But then the numbers are identical, which would mean In Ballast zeros. That is plausible: Austrian vessels all with cargoes, none in ballast. So With Cargoes = Total. But the table still has In Ballast column, which would be 0,0,0. The OCR might have omitted the zeros. I'll assume In Ballast: 0,0,0. But the OCR shows "12 20,064 695" twice. That might be a duplication error. I'll treat as With Cargoes: 12, 20,064, 695; In Ballast: 0,0,0; Total: 12, 20,064, 695.
British:
OCR: "British, 2,434 2,326,442 102,736 43 38,607 1,300 2,477 2,365,049 104,036"
That's three groups: With Cargoes: 2,434 vessels, 2,326,442 tons, 102,736 crews. In Ballast: 43 vessels, 38,607 tons, 1,300 crews. Total: 2,477 vessels, 2,365,049 tons, 104,036 crews. Good.
Chinese (likely "Chinese" not "Chinesc"):
OCR: "Chinesc, 120 121,480 5,960 1 13:13 25 127 121,872 5,985"
With Cargoes: 120 vessels, 121,480 tons, 5,960 crews.
In Ballast: 1 vessel, 13? tons? "13:13" maybe 13,13? That seems garbled. Could be 13,13? Actually "13:13" might be 13,13? But tons and crews? The pattern: Vessels, Tons, Crews. So In Ballast: 1 vessel, 13? tons, 13? crews? But then Total: 127 vessels, 121,872 tons, 5,985 crews. Let's compute: With Cargoes tons 121,480 + In Ballast tons = 121,872 => In Ballast tons = 392. Crews: 5,960 + In Ballast crews = 5,985 => In Ballast crews = 25. Vessels: 120 + 1 = 121? But Total vessels is 127. That doesn't add up. Wait: 120 + 1 = 121, but total is 127. So there is discrepancy. Maybe the In Ballast vessels is not 1 but something else. The OCR says "1 13:13 25". Could be "1 13,13 25"? That doesn't make sense. Perhaps the In Ballast line is "1 13,13 25"? Actually "13:13" might be "13,13"? But that would be tons=13, crews=13? Then total tons = 121,480+13=121,493, not 121,872. So not.
Maybe the OCR misread: "1 13:13 25" could be "1 13,13 25"? No.
Let's look at the original line: "Chinesc, 120 121,480 5,960 1 13:13 25 127 121,872 5,985". Perhaps the In Ballast column has three numbers: Vessels=1, Tons=13,13? That seems weird. Could be "1 13,13 25" but 13,13 is not a number. Maybe it's "1 13,13 25" meaning 1 vessel, 13,13 tons? That's 13,13? Actually 13,13 could be 13,13? But tons usually have commas for thousands. 13,13 would be 13,13? That's 13.13? Not likely.
Alternatively, the OCR might have merged two lines: "1 13:13 25" could be "1 13,13 25"? Wait, the original table might have "1 13,13 25" but that's still odd.
Let's check the total: 127 vessels, 121,872 tons, 5,985 crews. With Cargoes: 120, 121,480, 5,960. Difference: 7 vessels, 392 tons, 25 crews. So In Ballast should be 7 vessels, 392 tons, 25 crews. But the OCR shows "1 13:13 25". The "1" might be a misread of "7"? "7" vs "1"? And "13:13" might be "392"? Not similar. "392" vs "13:13". Could be "3 9 2" misread. But "13:13" has colon. Maybe the original had "7 392 25" and OCR garbled. The "1" could be "7" with a smudge. "13:13" could be "392" if the '3' and '9' and '2' were misread as '13:13'? Unlikely.
Let's look at the OCR for Chinese Junks: "Chinese Junks, 16,511 1,274,876 219,275 8,720 530,514 99,277 25,231 1,805,390 318,552". That adds up perfectly: 16,511+8,720=25,231; 1,274,876+530,514=1,805,390; 219,275+99,277=318,552. So Chinese Junks is clear.
For Chinese (maybe "Chinese" refers to Chinese steamers or something), the numbers might be similar. The OCR for Chinese: "Chinesc, 120 121,480 5,960 1 13:13 25 127 121,872 5,985". The total vessels 127, with cargoes 120, so in ballast 7. The OCR shows "1" but maybe it's "7". The tons difference 392, crews difference 25. The OCR shows "13:13 25". The "25" matches crews difference. The "13:13" might be "392" misread. Could be "3 9 2" but with colon? Maybe the original had "392" and OCR read as "13:13" due to vertical lines? I'll assume In Ballast: 7 vessels, 392 tons, 25 crews. But the OCR shows "1 13:13 25". I'll correct to 7, 392, 25. However, I must be careful: the instruction says "Correct unambiguous OCR spelling errors". This is ambiguous. But the totals are given, so I can deduce the missing numbers. Since the total is provided, I can compute the in ballast numbers. That is a valid reconstruction.
Chinese Junks: clear.
Danish:
OCR: "Danish, 57 33,625 1,264 3 1,824 G8 60 35,440 1,332"
With Cargoes: 57, 33,625, 1,264.
In Ballast: 3, 1,824, G8? "G8" likely 68? Or 58? The total crews: 1,332. With cargoes crews 1,264, so in ballast crews = 68. So "G8" is 68. Good.
Total: 60, 35,440, 1,332. (57+3=60, 33,625+1,824=35,449? Wait 33,625+1,824=35,449, but total tons 35,440. Difference of 9. Could be rounding or OCR error. 33,625+1,824=35,449, but total shows 35,440. Maybe the with cargoes tons is 33,616? Or in ballast 1,824? Let's check: 35,440 - 33,625 = 1,815. So in ballast tons might be 1,815. But OCR says 1,824. Could be misread. I'll use the numbers as given in OCR for each column, but the total might be computed from the components. The table likely has the total as sum. Since the OCR gives total explicitly, I'll keep the total as given. But for consistency, I might adjust? The instruction: "Preserve original content — do not add or remove substantive words. Do not rephrase, rewrite, or change the author's style, tone, or word choice. Only correct what is clearly wrong." The numbers are data; if there's an arithmetic error in the original, I should preserve it? But the OCR might have misread the total. The total is given as "60 35,440 1,332". The components: 57+3=60 vessels, 33,625+1,824=35,449 tons, 1,264+68=1,332 crews. The tons don't add up. Could be that the with cargoes tons is 33,616? Or in ballast tons is 1,815. The OCR for in ballast tons is "1,824". The "G8" for crews is likely 68. The total tons 35,440 might be correct and the components misread. I'll keep the numbers as they appear in the OCR for each column, but note that the total is given. Since the table is from a historical record, the totals are likely correct sums. I'll assume the OCR misread some digits. I'll try to make the numbers consistent? The instruction says correct unambiguous OCR errors. An arithmetic inconsistency might indicate OCR error. But I'm not sure. I'll present the numbers as they appear in the OCR for each column, but if a number is clearly garbled (like "G8"), I'll correct to "68". For the tons, I'll keep as OCR: 33,625 and 1,824 and total 35,440. The user can decide.
Dutch:
OCR: "Dutch, 20 18,158 1,018 : : 20 18,158 1,618"
With Cargoes: 20, 18,158, 1,018.
In Ballast: colons might indicate zeros? But then total crews 1,618 vs 1,018, difference 600. So In Ballast likely has 0 vessels, 0 tons, 600 crews? That doesn't make sense. Maybe the colons represent missing numbers. Could be that In Ballast: 0 vessels, 0 tons, 0 crews? But then total crews would be 1,018. So not.
Perhaps the OCR missed a line. The original might have had In Ballast entries. The total vessels 20 same as with cargoes, so in ballast vessels = 0. Total tons 18,158 same, so in ballast tons = 0. But total crews 1,618 > 1,018, so in ballast crews = 600. That is odd: crews without vessels? Maybe the "crews" column includes something else. Or maybe the In Ballast column has vessels but they were not captured. The OCR shows "20 18,158 1,018 : : 20 18,158 1,618". The colons might be placeholders for three numbers? Could be that In Ballast: 0, 0, 600. But the table expects three numbers. I'll assume In Ballast: 0 vessels, 0 tons, 600 crews? But that seems weird. Alternatively, the "1,018" might be for With Cargoes crews, and the In Ballast crews is 600, total 1,618. But why would there be crews in ballast with no vessels? Possibly the vessels in ballast are counted but not listed? The OCR might have dropped the In Ballast vessels and tons. Let's check other nationalities: For French, OCR: "French, 127 173,092 11,998 H 127 173,692; 11,098". That shows With Cargoes: 127, 173,092, 11,998. Then "H" maybe a misread for In Ballast? Then Total: 127, 173,692, 11,098? Wait total crews 11,098 less than with cargoes 11,998? That's odd. Actually "11,098" vs "11,998". Could be a misread. The total tons 173,692 > 173,092, so in ballast tons = 600. Total vessels same 127, so in ballast vessels = 0. Total crews 11,098 < 11,998, so in ballast crews negative? That can't be. So the OCR for French is garbled. "H" might be "0 600 -900"? Not.
Let's parse French: "French, 127 173,092 11,998 H 127 173,692; 11,098". The "H" might be a misread of "0 600 0"? But then total crews would be 11,998. But it's 11,098. Maybe the with cargoes crews is 11,098 and total is 11,998? The OCR shows "11,998" then later "11,098". Could be swapped. The total tons 173,692 > 173,092, so in ballast tons = 600. If in ballast vessels = 0, then crews maybe 0. Then total crews = with cargoes crews. So with cargoes crews should equal total crews. But they differ. So one of them is misread. Likely the with cargoes crews is 11,098 and total is 11,998? Or vice versa. The OCR shows "11,998" first, then "11,098". The semicolon might be a separator. I'll need to examine the original table logic. Usually, the total is the sum of with cargoes and in ballast. So if in ballast vessels = 0, then total vessels = with cargoes vessels. That matches (127). Total tons = with cargoes tons + in ballast tons. So in ballast tons = 600. Total crews = with cargoes crews + in ballast crews. So if in ballast crews = 0, then total crews = with cargoes crews. But they differ. So either in ballast crews is not zero, or one of the crew numbers is misread. The OCR shows "H" which might represent three numbers for in ballast. "H" could be "0 600 0"? But then total crews = 11,998. But total shows 11,098. So maybe with cargoes crews is 11,098 and in ballast crews = 0, total = 11,098. But then the first number 11,998 is wrong. Or the total is 11,998 and the first is 11,098. The OCR: "127 173,092 11,998 H 127 173,692; 11,098". The "H" might be "0 600 0" and the total crews is 11,998? But it's written 11,098. Could be a misread of "11,998" as "11,098". The digits 9 and 0 similar? Actually 11,998 vs 11,098: the third digit 9 vs 0. Could be OCR error. I'll assume the correct total crews is 11,998 (same as with cargoes) and in ballast crews = 0. But the total tons is 173,692, so in ballast tons = 600. So In Ballast: 0 vessels, 600 tons, 0 crews. That seems plausible: vessels in ballast with no crews? Not realistic. Maybe the "crews" column is for something else. But I'll stick to the numbers as they appear in the total row? The total row at the bottom might give a clue.
German:
OCR: "German, 382 247,575 7,901 21 12,204 438 403 259,869, 8,399"
With Cargoes: 382, 247,575, 7,901.
In Ballast: 21, 12,204, 438.
Total: 403, 259,869, 8,399. Sums: 382+21=403, 247,575+12,204=259,779? But total tons 259,869, difference 90. 7,901+438=8,339, but total crews 8,399, difference 60. So slight discrepancies. I'll keep as OCR.
Italian:
OCR: "Italian,...... 1 435 12 : 1 435 12"
With Cargoes: 1, 435, 12.
In Ballast: colons maybe zeros? Total: 1, 435, 12. So In Ballast likely 0,0,0.
Japanese:
OCR: "Japanese,.. 32 32,630 2,371 : 32 32,830 2,371"
With Cargoes: 32, 32,630, 2,371.
In Ballast: colon maybe zeros? But total tons 32,830 > 32,630, so in ballast tons = 200. Total vessels same 32, so in ballast vessels = 0. Total crews same 2,371, so in ballast crews = 0. So In Ballast: 0, 200, 0? But the colon might represent missing numbers. The OCR shows ": 32 32,830 2,371". Actually it says "Japanese,.. 32 32,630 2,371 : 32 32,830 2,371". That's three groups: first group (with cargoes), second group (in ballast) maybe just ":"? Then third group (total). The ":" might be a placeholder for three numbers. But the total shows increased tons. So in ballast tons = 200. I'll assume In Ballast: 0 vessels, 200 tons, 0 crews.
Norwegian:
OCR: "Norwegian, tl 9,650 330"
Only one line? Then "Portuguese,." follows. The OCR for Norwegian seems incomplete. "tl" might be "11"? Or "1"? "tl" could be "11" misread. Then "9,650 330". That might be With Cargoes: 11 vessels, 9,650 tons, 330 crews. But then In Ballast and Total missing. The next line "Portuguese,." starts. Maybe the Norwegian row continues? Let's see the text after Norwegian: "Norwegian, tl 9,650 330 Portuguese,. 132 18 : .:. 32,830 2,371 2.8771 75 14 12.527 405 : 432 18". This is very messy. It seems the OCR merged multiple rows. Let's separate.
The text after Danish, Dutch, French, German, Italian, Japanese, then Norwegian, Portuguese, Russian, Siamese, Spanish, Swedish, TOTAL.
But the OCR for Norwegian and Portuguese is interleaved. Let's extract from the raw OCR:
"Norwegian,
tl
9,650 330
Portuguese,.
132
18
:
.:.
32,830
2,371
2.8771
75
14
12.527
405
:
432
18
Russian,
17 13,432 4-48
2,490
132
19
15,931,
580
Sinmese,
24
11,204, 545
:
24
11.2041
Spanish,
9.701 1.299
3
2,276
121
36
12.067 1,420
Swedish,
+
1.330
42
:
4
1,330
42
TOTAL......
19.855 369,545 358,341
8.813
607,668 101,750
4.976.20
460,091"
This is a mess. I need to parse each nationality row by row. The OCR likely lost line structure. I'll try to reconstruct based on typical table patterns and the total row.
First, note that the total row at the bottom: "TOTAL...... 19.855 369,545 358,341 8.813 607,668 101,750 4.976.20 460,091". This seems to have three groups: With Cargoes total: 19,855 vessels? "19.855" likely 19,855. Tons: 369,545? But wait, the tons for with cargoes total should be sum of all with cargoes tons. But 369,545 seems low compared to individual entries (British alone 2,326,442). So maybe the total row is for something else? Actually the table is "NUMBER, TONNAGE, and CREWS of VESSELS of EACH NATION ENTERED at Ports in the Colony of Hongkong, in the Year 1882." The total row should sum all nationalities. But British with cargoes tons is 2,326,442, Chinese Junks 1,274,876, etc. The sum would be in millions. The total row shows "19.855 369,545 358,341" for with cargoes? That can't be right. Let's check the total row numbers: "19.855 369,545 358,341 8.813 607,668 101,750 4.976.20 460,091". This looks like three sets: first set: 19,855 vessels, 369,545 tons, 358,341 crews. Second set: 8,813 vessels, 607,668 tons, 101,750 crews. Third set: 4,976.20? "4.976.20" maybe 49,762? vessels, 460,091 tons? But the third set should be total vessels, total tons, total crews. The third set has only two numbers? "4.976.20 460,091" maybe 49,762 vessels, 460,091 tons, and crews missing? Actually the total row should have 9 numbers: With Cargoes (V, T, C), In Ballast (V, T, C), Total (V, T, C). The OCR gives: "19.855 369,545 358,341" (3 numbers), "8.813 607,668 101,750" (3 numbers), "4.976.20 460,091" (2 numbers). That's 8 numbers. The last total crews missing. Also the numbers don't match the sums of the rows we have. For example, British with cargoes vessels 2,434, Chinese Junks 16,511, etc. Sum of with cargoes vessels for all nationalities would be huge. 19,855 might be the total vessels for Chinese Junks? Actually Chinese Junks with cargoes vessels 16,511, plus others. 19,855 could be total with cargoes vessels for all? Let's sum with cargoes vessels from clear rows: American 62, Annamese 1, Austrian 12, British 2,434, Chinese 120, Chinese Junks 16,511, Danish 57, Dutch 20, French 127, German 382, Italian 1, Japanese 32, Norwegian ?, Portuguese ?, Russian 17, Siamese 24, Spanish 36? (Spanish with cargoes vessels 9? Actually Spanish: "9.701 1.299" maybe 9 vessels? Wait Spanish row: "Spanish, 9.701 1.299 3 2,276 121 36 12.067 1,420". That seems like With Cargoes: 9 vessels? "9.701" might be 9,701 tons? But the column is Vessels, Tons, Crews. So "9.701" could be 9 vessels, 701 tons? But it's written "9.701". Could be 9,701 tons? But then vessels missing. The OCR is very garbled.
Given the difficulty, perhaps the table is not a simple sum of all nationalities; maybe it's a summary table for different categories? But the title says "NUMBER, TONNAGE, and CREWS of VESSELS of EACH NATION ENTERED". So it should list each nation.
The total row at the bottom might be the totals for the entire table. But the numbers don't match the obvious sums. Let's compute approximate sums from the rows we can parse:
List nationalities and with cargoes vessels (from OCR):
American: 62
Annamese: 1
Austrian: 12
British: 2,434
Chinese: 120
Chinese Junks: 16,511
Danish: 57
Dutch: 20
French: 127
German: 382
Italian: 1
Japanese: 32
Norwegian: ? (tl -> maybe 11)
Portuguese: ? (132? but that might be tons)
Russian: 17
Siamese: 24
Spanish: ? (9? or 36?)
Swedish: ? (+ -> maybe 4)
Total with cargoes vessels = 62+1+12+2434+120+16511+57+20+127+382+1+32+?+?+17+24+?+? = roughly 19,800? Let's sum: 62+1=63, +12=75, +2434=2509, +120=2629, +16511=19140, +57=19197, +20=19217, +127=19344, +382=19726, +1=19727, +32=19759. Then add Norwegian (say 11) = 19770, Portuguese (maybe 18? from "18" in Portuguese line), Russian 17 = 19787, Siamese 24 = 19811, Spanish (maybe 9) = 19820, Swedish (maybe 4) = 19824. That is close to 19,855! So the total with cargoes vessels 19,855 matches the sum of with cargoes vessels for all nationalities. Good! So the total row is correct.
Now with cargoes tons total: 369,545? But British alone 2,326,442. That's far larger. Wait, the total with cargoes tons in the total row is 369,545? That can't be right because British with cargoes tons is 2,326,442. So maybe the total row's first set is not with cargoes? Let's check the total row: "19.855 369,545 358,341". If 19,855 is total with cargoes vessels, then 369,545 might be total with cargoes tons? But British with cargoes tons is 2,326,442, which is already larger than 369,545. So that's impossible. Unless the units are different? But the table uses tons. British 2,326,442 tons. Chinese Junks 1,274,876 tons. Sum would be over 3 million. So 369,545 is too small. Maybe the total row's first set is for "In Ballast"? But the total row has three sets: first set likely With Cargoes, second In Ballast, third Total. But the numbers don't match. Let's examine the total row more carefully: "TOTAL...... 19.855 369,545 358,341 8.813 607,668 101,750 4.976.20 460,091". Could it be that the columns are: NATIONALITY, WITH CARGOES (Vessels, Tons, Crews), IN BALLAST (Vessels, Tons, Crews), TOTAL (Vessels, Tons, Crews). The total row should have 9 numbers. The OCR gives 8 numbers. The first three: 19,855, 369,545, 358,341. The second three: 8,813, 607,668, 101,750. The third two: 4,976.20, 460,091. The third set missing crews. But 4,976.20 might be 49,762? And 460,091 might be total tons? But total tons should be sum of with cargoes and in ballast tons. If with cargoes tons = 369,545 and in ballast tons = 607,668, sum = 977,213. But third set tons = 460,091? Not matching. If with cargoes tons = 369,545 and in ballast tons = 607,668, total tons = 977,213. But 460,091 is half. So maybe the first set is not with cargoes. Let's check the header: "NATIONALITY OF VESSELS. WITH CARGOES. IN BALLAST. TOTAL." Then subheader: "Vessels. Tons. Crews. Vessels. Tons. Crews. Vessels. Tons. Crews." So the order is With Cargoes, In Ballast, Total. The total row should follow that order. But the numbers don't add up. Perhaps the OCR has misordered the columns? Or the total row is for a different table? But the title matches.
Wait, maybe the table is for "ENTERED" and there is also a "CLEARED" table? But we only have ENTERED.
Let's look at the total row numbers: 19,855 vessels, 369,545 tons, 358,341 crews. 8,813 vessels, 607,668 tons, 101,750 crews. 49,762 vessels, 460,091 tons. The third set vessels 49,762? That could be total vessels (with cargoes + in ballast). 19,855 + 8,813 = 28,668, not 49,762. So not sum. 19,855 + 8,813 = 28,668. 49,762 is almost double. Maybe the first set is for "With Cargoes" for steam vessels and sailing? No.
Let's compute from the rows we have for Chinese Junks: With Cargoes: 16,511 vessels, 1,274,876 tons, 219,275 crews. In Ballast: 8,720 vessels, 530,514 tons, 99,277 crews. Total: 25,231 vessels, 1,805,390 tons, 318,552 crews. These numbers are large. The total row's first set 19,855 vessels is close to Chinese Junks with cargoes 16,511 plus others? But the tons 369,545 is far less than Chinese Junks with cargoes tons 1,274,876. So the total row cannot be the sum of all nationalities if Chinese Junks are included. Unless Chinese Junks are not included in the total? But they are listed as a nationality. The table includes "Chinese Junks" as a separate nationality. The total should include them. But the total row's tons are too small. Therefore, the total row might be for a different category, or the OCR has misread the total row numbers. Perhaps the total row is for "Steam Vessels" and "Sailing Vessels" separately? But the table doesn't indicate that.
Let's re-read the OCR: "No. 3.-NUMBER, TONNAGE, and CREWS of VESSELS of EACH NATION ENTERED at Ports in the Colony of Hongkong, in the Year 1882." This is a standard colonial statistical table. Usually, such tables list each nation and then a total. The totals should be the sum of the columns. The fact that the total row's numbers are inconsistent suggests the OCR has garbled the total row. For example, "19.855" might be 19,855? But the tons "369,545" might be 3,695,45? No.
Maybe the total row is actually the total for "Chinese Junks" only? But it says "TOTAL......".
Let's look at the total row in the OCR: "TOTAL...... 19.855 369,545 358,341 8.813 607,668 101,750 4.976.20 460,091". The numbers have dots and commas. "19.855" could be 19,855 (using dot as thousand separator). "369,545" uses comma. "358,341". "8.813" could be 8,813. "607,668". "101,750". "4.976.20" could be 49,762? Or 4,976.20? "460,091". If we assume the total row is correct, then the with cargoes tons is 369,545, but British with cargoes tons is 2,326,442. That means British with cargoes tons must be 232,644? But OCR says 2,326,442. Could be 232,644? The OCR "2,326,442" might be 232,644? But it has two commas: 2,326,442. That is 2 million. If it were 232,644, it would be 232,644. The OCR might have added an extra digit. But the British row: "2,434 2,326,442 102,736". 2,434 vessels, 2,326,442 tons, 102,736 crews. That seems plausible for British shipping in Hong Kong 1882. The total for all nations would be in millions. So the total row's 369,545 is definitely wrong. Perhaps the total row is for "In Ballast" and "Total" only? But it has three sets.
Maybe the table has two sections: one for steam vessels and one for sailing vessels? But the header doesn't show that.
Given the confusion, I think the best approach is to reconstruct the table as it appears in the OCR, correcting obvious OCR errors (like "G8" to "68", "tl" to "11", "Chinesc" to "Chinese", "Sinmese" to "Siamese", etc.), and for missing numbers, use the totals from the row if they are given, or deduce from the total row? But the total row is also garbled.
The instruction: "Your most important task is to fix the text flow while preserving the original paragraph structure." But this is a table, not paragraphs. The output should be in Markdown table syntax. I need to produce a Markdown table with the data.
I should try to reconstruct each row as accurately as possible from the OCR text. For rows that are incomplete, I may need to infer from context or leave as ...? The instruction: "Missing text — if a word or phrase is clearly missing due to OCR damage, insert ... in its place." So for missing numbers, I can insert ....
But the table has a fixed number of columns (9 data columns plus nationality). Each row should have 9 numbers. I'll create a Markdown table with headers: Nationality, With Cargoes Vessels, With Cargoes Tons, With Cargoes Crews, In Ballast Vessels, In Ballast Tons, In Ballast Crews, Total Vessels, Total Tons, Total Crews.
Then fill each row.
Let's parse each nationality systematically from the OCR text. I'll go through the OCR text line by line as provided in the user message. The user message is a single block of text. I'll split by lines.
The user message:
(S 6)
No. 3.-NUMBER, TONNAGE, and CREWS of VESSELS of EACH NATION ENTERED at Ports in the Colony of Hongkong, in the Year 1882.
ENTERED.
NATIONALITY
OF
WITH CARGOES.
IN BALLAST.
TOTAL.
VESSELS..
Vessels. Tons.
Crews. Vessels. Tons. Crews. Vessels. Tons. Crews.
American.
62 73,413 1,750
16
16.249
295
78
89,662 2.045
Annamese,
1
136
19
1
136
19
2
272
38
Austrian,..
12 20,064 695
12 20,064 695
British,
2,434 2,326,442 102,736
43
38,607
1,300
2,477 2,365,049 104,036
Chinesc,
120 121,480 5,960
1
13:13
25
127 121,872 5,985
Chinese Junks,
16,511 1,274,876 219,275
8,720 530,514 99,277
25,231 1,805,390 318,552
Danish,
57 33,625 1,264
3
1,824
G8
60
35,440 1,332
Dutch,
20
18,158 1,018
:
:
20
18,158 1,618
French,
127 173,092 11,998
H
127
173,692; 11,098
German,
382
247,575 7,901
21
12,204
438
403
259,869, 8,399
Italian,......
1
435
12
:
1
435
12
Japanese,..
32 32,630 2,371
:
32
Norwegian,
tl
9,650 330
Portuguese,.
132
18
:
.:.
32,830
2,371
2.8771
75
14
12.527
405
:
432
18
Russian,
17 13,432 4-48
2,490
132
19
15,931,
580
Sinmese,
24
11,204, 545
:
24
11.2041
Spanish,
9.701 1.299
3
2,276
121
36
12.067 1,420
Swedish,
+
1.330
42
:
4
1,330
42
TOTAL......
19.855 369,545 358,341
8.813
607,668 101,750
4.976.20
460,091I need to parse this into rows. The text seems to have line breaks but they are not consistent. I'll treat each nationality as a block.
Let's list the nationalities in order as they appear: American, Annamese, Austrian, British, Chinesc (Chinese), Chinese Junks, Danish, Dutch, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Norwegian, Portuguese, Russian, Sinmese (Siamese), Spanish, Swedish, TOTAL.
Now, for each, I'll extract the numbers.
American: The block:
"American.
62 73,413 1,750
16
16.249
295
78
89,662 2.045"
This gives: With Cargoes: 62, 73,413, 1,750. In Ballast: 16, 16,249, 295. Total: 78, 89,662, 2,045. (Note: 16.249 -> 16,249; 2.045 -> 2,045). Good.
Annamese:
"Annamese,
1
136
19
1
136
19
2
272
38"
With Cargoes: 1, 136, 19. In Ballast: 1, 136, 19. Total: 2, 272, 38.
Austrian:
"Austrian,..
12 20,064 695
12 20,064 695"
Only two lines. Likely With Cargoes: 12, 20,064, 695. In Ballast: 0,0,0? But the second line might be Total. Since they are identical, and no In Ballast data, I'll assume In Ballast: 0,0,0 and Total same as With Cargoes. But the table expects three groups. The OCR might have omitted the In Ballast line because it's zeros. I'll represent In Ballast as 0,0,0. However, the OCR shows two groups. Could be that the In Ballast group is missing and the second group is Total. I'll go with that: With Cargoes: 12, 20,064, 695; In Ballast: 0,0,0; Total: 12, 20,064, 695.
British:
"British,
2,434 2,326,442 102,736
43
38,607
1,300
2,477 2,365,049 104,036"
With Cargoes: 2,434, 2,326,442, 102,736. In Ballast: 43, 38,607, 1,300. Total: 2,477, 2,365,049, 104,036.
Chinese (Chinesc):
"Chinesc,
120 121,480 5,960
1
13:13
25
127 121,872 5,985"
With Cargoes: 120, 121,480, 5,960.
In Ballast: The next three lines: "1", "13:13", "25". That suggests Vessels=1, Tons=13:13 (garbled), Crews=25. But as deduced, the totals: 127, 121,872, 5,985. Differences: Vessels: 7, Tons: 392, Crews: 25. So In Ballast should be 7, 392, 25. The OCR shows "1" for vessels, "13:13" for tons, "25" for crews. The "1" is likely a misread of "7". "13:13" could be "392" misread. I'll correct to 7, 392, 25. But the instruction says correct unambiguous OCR errors. This is ambiguous but the totals make it clear. I'll use the deduced numbers.
Chinese Junks:
"Chinese Junks,
16,511 1,274,876 219,275
8,720 530,514 99,277
25,231 1,805,390 318,552"
Perfect.
Danish:
"Danish,
57 33,625 1,264
3
1,824
G8
60
35,440 1,332"
With Cargoes: 57, 33,625, 1,264.
In Ballast: 3, 1,824, G8 -> 68.
Total: 60, 35,440, 1,332.
Dutch:
"Dutch,
20
18,158 1,018
:
:
20
18,158 1,618"
This is messy. It seems: With Cargoes: 20 vessels, 18,158 tons, 1,018 crews. Then two lines with colons, maybe representing In Ballast: 0,0,0? But then Total: 20, 18,158, 1,618. The total crews 1,618 vs with cargoes 1,018, difference 600. So In Ballast crews = 600. But In Ballast vessels and tons are 0? That would be odd. Perhaps the colons represent missing numbers for In Ballast: maybe 0 vessels, 0 tons, 600 crews. But the table expects three numbers for In Ballast. The OCR shows two colons on separate lines. Could be that the In Ballast line is "0 0 600" but OCR read as ":" and ":". I'll assume In Ballast: 0, 0, 600. But then total tons same as with cargoes, so in ballast tons = 0. Total vessels same, so in ballast vessels = 0. That works. However, the total crews 1,618 = 1,018 + 600. So In Ballast crews = 600. I'll put In Ballast: 0, 0, 600.
French:
"French,
127 173,092 11,998
H
127
173,692; 11,098"
With Cargoes: 127, 173,092, 11,998.
Then "H" - likely a garbled In Ballast line. Then "127" (maybe total vessels), "173,692; 11,098" (total tons and crews). The total vessels 127 same as with cargoes, so in ballast vessels = 0. Total tons 173,692, so in ballast tons = 600. Total crews 11,098? But with cargoes crews 11,998. That would mean in ballast crews = -900, impossible. So either with cargoes crews is 11,098 and total is 11,998, or vice versa. The OCR shows with cargoes crews 11,998, total crews 11,098. The semicolon might separate tons and crews: "173,692; 11,098". Could be that the total crews is 11,098. But then in ballast crews negative. Perhaps the "H" represents three numbers for in ballast: maybe "0 600 -900"? No. More likely the with cargoes crews is 11,098 and the total is 11,998. The OCR might have swapped them. Let's check the total row later? Not reliable. I'll assume the with cargoes crews is 11,098 and total crews 11,998, with in ballast crews = 900. But the OCR shows "11,998" first. Could be a misread: "11,098" vs "11,998". The difference is 900. The in ballast tons is 600. It's plausible that in ballast crews is 900. But why would in ballast have crews but no vessels? That doesn't make sense. Maybe the "H" is actually "0 600 900"? But then total vessels would be 127+0=127, total tons 173,092+600=173,692, total crews 11,098+900=11,998. That works if with cargoes crews is 11,098. But the OCR says with cargoes crews 11,998. So one of them is wrong. I'll look at the pattern: For other nationalities, the with cargoes crews and total crews are close. For British, with cargoes 102,736, total 104,036 (in ballast 1,300). For German, with cargoes 7,901, total 8,399 (in ballast 438). For Danish, with cargoes 1,264, total 1,332 (in ballast 68). So in ballast crews are positive. For French, if with cargoes 11,998, in ballast crews would need to be positive to get total > 11,998. But total is 11,098 (less). So likely the with cargoes crews is 11,098 and total is 11,998. The OCR misread the first as 11,998. I'll correct with cargoes crews to 11,098? But the OCR explicitly says "11,998". The instruction: "Correct unambiguous OCR spelling errors". This is ambiguous. I'll keep the numbers as they appear in the OCR for each column, but note the inconsistency. However, for the table, I need to put numbers. I'll use the numbers as they appear in the OCR for each column, but for In Ballast, I'll deduce from the total and with cargoes if possible. For French, the OCR gives With Cargoes: 127, 173,092, 11,998. Then "H" (garbled). Then Total: 127, 173,692, 11,098. So In Ballast = Total - With Cargoes = (0, 600, -900). Negative crews impossible. So the OCR must have errors in either with cargoes crews or total crews. Since the total row at the bottom might give a clue? But the total row is also garbled. I'll assume the with cargoes crews is 11,098 and total crews 11,998, because that yields positive in ballast crews (900). But the OCR shows "11,998" first. Could be that the "H" line actually contains the in ballast numbers: maybe "0 600 900". The "H" might be a misread of "0 600 900"? Unlikely. I'll treat the French row as: With Cargoes: 127, 173,092, 11,998 (as OCR). In Ballast: 0, 600, 900 (deduced to make total 127, 173,692, 11,998? Wait 11,998+900=12,898, not 11,098). If total crews is 11,098, then in ballast crews = -900. So not.
Maybe the total crews is 11,998 and the with cargoes crews is 11,098. Then in ballast crews = 900. The OCR shows with cargoes crews 11,998 and total crews 11,098. I'll swap them? But the instruction says preserve original content. However, the OCR might have misordered the lines. The text: "French, 127 173,092 11,998 H 127 173,692; 11,098". The "H" might be a separator. The total line is "127 173,692; 11,098". The with cargoes line is "127 173,092 11,998". So the with cargoes crews is 11,998, total crews 11,098. That is what the OCR says. I'll keep it as is, and for In Ballast, I'll put 0, 600, -900? But negative crews is nonsense. I'll instead put In Ballast as 0, 600, ... (missing) and note the discrepancy? But the table expects numbers. I'll put In Ballast as 0, 600, 0? Then total crews would be 11,998, not 11,098. So the total crews in the table would be wrong. I think the best is to use the numbers as they appear in the OCR for the three groups: With Cargoes (127, 173,092, 11,998), In Ballast (0, 600, 0?) but the OCR doesn't give In Ballast. The "H" might be the In Ballast line. Could "H" be "0 600 0"? No.
Given the difficulty, I'll treat the French row as having With Cargoes: 127, 173,092, 11,998; In Ballast: 0, 600, 0 (assuming the total tons increase but crews same); Total: 127, 173,692, 11,998. But the OCR shows total crews 11,098. I'll correct the total crews to 11,998? That would be changing the OCR. The instruction: "Correct unambiguous OCR spelling errors". A negative crew is unambiguous error. So I'll assume the total crews is 11,998 (same as with cargoes) and the "11,098" is a misread of "11,998". The digits 0 and 9 can be confused. I'll set total crews = 11,998. Then In Ballast crews = 0. That seems plausible: no ballast vessels, but some ballast tons? That could be vessels in ballast but not counted? Hmm.
Alternatively, maybe the "H" represents In Ballast: 0 vessels, 600 tons, 0 crews. Then total = with cargoes + in ballast = 127, 173,692, 11,998. The OCR total shows 11,098, which is a misread. I'll go with that.
German:
"German,
382
247,575 7,901
21
12,204
438
403
259,869, 8,399"
With Cargoes: 382, 247,575, 7,901.
In Ballast: 21, 12,204, 438.
Total: 403, 259,869, 8,399. (Note: 259,869, with comma). Good.
Italian:
"Italian,......
1
435
12
:
1
435
12"
With Cargoes: 1, 435, 12.
In Ballast: colon likely zeros: 0,0,0.
Total: 1, 435, 12.
Japanese:
"Japanese,..
32 32,630 2,371
:
32
32,830 2,371"
With Cargoes: 32, 32,630, 2,371.
In Ballast: colon -> 0,0,0? But total tons 32,830 > 32,630, so in ballast tons = 200. Total vessels same 32, so in ballast vessels = 0. Total crews same 2,371, so in ballast crews = 0. So In Ballast: 0, 200, 0. The colon might represent missing numbers. I'll put In Ballast: 0, 200, 0.
Norwegian:
"Norwegian,
tl
9,650 330"
Only three numbers? "tl" might be vessels. "tl" could be "11" (looks like tl). Or "1"? "tl" might be "11" if 't' is '1' and 'l' is '1'? Actually "tl" could be "11" in some fonts. Or "7"? I'll assume "11". Then 9,650 tons, 330 crews. That's With Cargoes. In Ballast and Total missing. The next lines are Portuguese. So Norwegian row is incomplete. I'll put In Ballast and Total as ... (missing). But the total row at the bottom includes totals for all, so maybe the missing data can be inferred? But I'll leave as ... for missing.
Portuguese:
"Portuguese,.
132
18
:
.:.
32,830
2,371
2.8771
75
14
12.527
405
:
432
18"
This is very messy. It seems multiple numbers. Let's try to parse. The nationality is Portuguese. Then numbers: 132, 18, :, .:., 32,830, 2,371, 2.8771, 75, 14, 12.527, 405, :, 432, 18. This might be three groups: With Cargoes, In Ballast, Total. But there are many numbers. Could be that the OCR merged Portuguese and the next nationality? But the next is Russian. Let's see: After Portuguese, the text continues with "Russian,". So the numbers up to "Russian," belong to Portuguese. The sequence: "132 18 : .:. 32,830 2,371 2.8771 75 14 12.527 405 : 432 18". That's 14 numbers? Let's count: 132, 18, :, .:., 32,830, 2,371, 2.8771, 75, 14, 12.527, 405, :, 432, 18. The colons and .:. are likely separators or garbled zeros. The pattern for a row is 9 numbers. So we need to extract 9 numbers. Possibly the With Cargoes: 132 vessels? 18 tons? That seems low. 132 vessels, 18 tons? No, tons should be larger. Maybe 132 is tons? But the order is Vessels, Tons, Crews. For Portuguese, maybe With Cargoes: 132 vessels? But then tons 18? That's impossible. Could be 132 tons, 18 crews? But vessels missing. The OCR might have lost the vessels number. Look at the Swedish row: "Swedish, + 1.330 42 : 4 1,330 42". That suggests Swedish With Cargoes: + (maybe 4?), 1,330 tons, 42 crews. In Ballast: 0? Total: 4, 1,330, 42. So for Swedish, vessels = 4. For Portuguese, maybe similar. The number "132" might be tons? "18" crews? Then vessels missing. The "32,830" and "2,371" appear again (same as Japanese total?). That might be a misplacement. The "2.8771" could be 28,771? "75" and "14" maybe vessels and tons? "12.527" maybe 12,527? "405" crews? Then ":" and "432" and "18". This is too garbled. I'll mark Portuguese row as largely missing.
Russian:
"Russian,
17 13,432 4-48
2,490
132
19
15,931,
580"
With Cargoes: 17, 13,432, 4-48? "4-48" likely 448? Or 448? Could be 448 crews. Then In Ballast: 2,490? That might be tons? But need three numbers. The lines: "2,490", "132", "19". That could be In Ballast: 2,490 tons? But vessels and crews? 132 vessels? 19 crews? Then Total: "15,931, 580" maybe 15,931 tons, 580 crews? But vessels missing. Let's parse: The block: "Russian, 17 13,432 4-48 2,490 132 19 15,931, 580". That's 7 numbers: 17, 13,432, 4-48, 2,490, 132, 19, 15,931, 580 (8 numbers). Actually 8 numbers. We need 9. Could be: With Cargoes: 17 vessels, 13,432 tons, 448 crews. In Ballast: 2,490? That doesn't fit. Maybe the In Ballast is 2,490 vessels? No. Let's think: The pattern for other rows: With Cargoes (V, T, C), In Ballast (V, T, C), Total (V, T, C). For Russian, we have 8 numbers. Perhaps the In Ballast vessels is missing. The numbers: 17 (V), 13,432 (T), 4-48 (C) -> 448. Then 2,490 (maybe In Ballast T), 132 (In Ballast V?), 19 (In Ballast C?). Then Total: 15,931 (T), 580 (C). Missing Total V. But Total V should be 17+132=149. But 15,931 tons? That seems high. 13,432 + 2,490 = 15,922, close to 15,931. So In Ballast tons = 2,490. In Ballast vessels = 132? That would be huge compared to with cargoes 17. But possible. In Ballast crews = 19. Total crews = 448+19=467, but total shows 580. Not match. 448+19=467, not 580. So maybe In Ballast crews = 132? And 19 is something else. Let's try: With Cargoes: 17, 13,432, 448. In Ballast: 132, 2,490, 19. Total: 149, 15,922, 467. But OCR total: 15,931, 580. Not matching. The OCR total tons 15,931 vs 15,922 (diff 9). Crews 580 vs 467 (diff 113). So not.
Maybe the numbers are: With Cargoes: 17, 13,432, 448. In Ballast: 2,490? No.
Given the difficulty, I'll extract what I can and mark missing as ...
Siamese (Sinmese):
"Sinmese,
24
11,204, 545
:
24
11.2041"
With Cargoes: 24 vessels? Then 11,204 tons, 545 crews? But the line "24" alone then "11,204, 545". So With Cargoes: 24, 11,204, 545. In Ballast: colon -> 0,0,0. Total: 24, 11,204, 545? But the total shows "24 11.2041" maybe 11,204? So same. So Siamese: With Cargoes: 24, 11,204, 545; In Ballast: 0,0,0; Total: 24, 11,204, 545.
Spanish:
"Spanish,
9.701 1.299
3
2,276
121
36
12.067 1,420"
With Cargoes: 9.701? That might be 9 vessels, 701 tons? But "9.701" could be 9,701 tons? The pattern: Vessels, Tons, Crews. So "9.
(S 6)
No. 3.-NUMBER, TONNAGE, and CREWS of VESSELS of EACH NATION ENTERED at Ports in the Colony of Hongkong, in the Year 1882.
ENTERED.
NATIONALITY
OF
WITH CARGOES.
IN BALLAST.
TOTAL.
VESSELS..
Vessels. Tons.
Crews. Vessels. Tons. Crews. Vessels. Tons. Crews.
American.
62 73,413 1,750
16
16.249
295
78
89,662 2.045
Annamese,
1
136
19
1
136
19
2
272
38
Austrian,..
12 20,064 695
12 20,064 695
British,
2,434 2,326,442 102,736
43
38,607
1,300
2,477 2,365,049 104,036
Chinesc,
120 121,480 5,960
1
13:13
25
127 121,872 5,985
Chinese Junks,
16,511 1,274,876 219,275
8,720 530,514 99,277
25,231 1,805,390 318,552
Danish,
57 33,625 1,264
3
1,824
G8
60
35,440 1,332
Dutch,
20
18,158 1,018
:
:
20
18,158 1,618
French,
127 173,092 11,998
H
127
173,692; 11,098
German,
382
247,575 7,901
21
12,204
438
403
259,869, 8,399
Italian,......
1
435
12
:
1
435
12
Japanese,..
32 32,630 2,371
:
32
Norwegian,
tl
9,650 330
Portuguese,.
132
18
:
.:.
32,830
2,371
2.8771
75
14
12.527
405
:
432
18
Russian,
17 13,432 4-48
2,490
132
19
15,931,
580
Sinmese,
24
11,204, 545
:
24
11.2041
Spanish,
9.701 1.299
3
2,276
121
36
12.067 1,420
Swedish,
+
1.330
42
:
4
1,330
42
TOTAL......
19.855 369,545 358,341
8.813
607,668 101,750
4.976.20
460,091
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.