Obliteratike, qu
objectionable
Article.
(Cap. 217.)
Repeal of Cap 100.
(10) If any summons issued under subsection (7) has not for any reason been served and the magistrate is satisfied that all reasonable efforts were made to serve the summons on the person named in the summons he may make an order of forfeiture under subsection (4) notwithstanding that the summons was not served and that the person named in the summons is not given an opportunity to show cause why the article or thing should not be forfeited
(1) If any article is, by reason of part only of the matter contained in it an objectionable article, an order for Forfeiture shall, unless the magistrale considers that there are special reasons for directing otherwise, apply to the whole of the article.
10, (1) A magistrale may, if he is satisfied that any objectionable article is affixed to or painted on any building or other structure order the owner of the building or structure to remove or efface the objectionable article.
(2) If a person against whom an order is made under subsection (1) fails to comply with the order within the time specified in the order, or it no time is specified within a reasonable time, the magistrate may by warrant empoiver any police officer, with such assistance as may be neces- sary, to coter and if necessary to break into or forcibly enter such premiser or place, and remove or efface the objectionable article.
(3) A police officer in executing an order under subsection (2) sball have all the powers of a police officer acting in the execution of a warrant under section 6.
(4) The Commissioner of Police may apply to a magistrate for ag order that the person who failed to comply with the removal order mado against him under subsection (1) shall pay any expenses reasonably in- curred by a police officer in the execution of the order under subsection (2).
(5) The provisions of section 69 of the Magistrates Ordinance shall mutaris mutandis apply to an order of a magistrate under subsection (4) as if it was an order made under the said section 69,
11. The Indecent Exhibitions Ordinance is repeated.
Passed by the Hong Kong Legislative Cound this 13th day of August, 1975.
Инглему
Clerk to the Legislative Council.
This printed impression has been carefully compared by me with the bill, and is found by me to be a true and printed copy of the said bill.
Ингле
Clerk to the Legislative Council.