208

HONG KONG URBAN COUNCIL

of

trouble is in design of the road networks and lack of co-ordination between

We are naturally concerned about congestion on our roads. Part of the

departments involved. For example, on Hong Kong Island, at the bottom of

Cotton Tree Drive, traffic grinds to a halt at peak hours simply because traffic

lanes from all directions meet there. If the H.M.S. Tamar installations had

been moved elsewhere when it was redeveloped or part of the newly built

Far East Finance Centre and Admiralty sites set back, it would still have been

possible to have extra flyovers to ease traffic movement.

At last month's Kowloon City District Board Meeting we were told that in

order to rebuild Princess Margaret Road flyover it was necessary to divert

west-bound traffic for about 2 years via Pui Ching Road into narrow Soares

Avenue with sharp U turns in Argyle Street and uphill to Kadoorie Avenue for

Prince Edward Road. Anyone who knows the area would be horrified at the

tortuous route. The suggestion that widening of Wylie Road giving direct

access more or less on level ground in a straight line to Prince Edward Road

was rejected, on the ground that it involved lengthy negotiations for

resumption of a strip of land bordering Wah Yan College playing fields.

Common sense should prevail. The rebuilding of Princess Margaret Road

flyover was planned many years ago. Was it not possible to co-ordinate the

action?

Singapore, often referred to as our twin city and held as a good example for

Hong Kong to imitate had in operation a far more simple system of charging

a fee for vehicles entering congested city streets at certain times. However,

even this had not been entirely successful. Last November the Singapore

Government was still asking its citizens to give them ideas on how to

discourage the growth of vehicles which were clogging its streets and

overtaking their extensive road building programme. Would it not therefore

have been wiser for Hong Kong to use the $35 million towards completing

our programme of roadworks? Before leaving this subject, I must also voice

my concern that millions of dollars have been spent on feasibilities studies by

consultants which are then subsequently overtaken by still more feasibility

studies, as in the case of the Lei Yue Mun Bridge project. As long as the

airport is not removed, there is no sense in carrying on endless studies on

this project. Surely the money should be channelled into less glamorous but

more practical solutions to relieve our present traffic problems.

With these words, Mr. Chairman, I support the motion.

DR. KIM Y. S. CHAM (in English):--Mr. Chairman,

The Centenary

The past year has been of great significance to the Council. It marked a

century of distinguished service to Hong Kong. As Chairman of the

Centenary Committee, I have much pleasure to report that the celebration

activities were a great success, remarkable for its excellent variety yet made

possible out of

HONG KONG URBAN COUNCIL

Page 121 of 194

209

a modest budget. A special vote of thanks must be conveyed to all those who

have contributed their valuable assistance—and in particular, our staff.

The celebrations started on April 18 with a special meeting in the Council

Chamber, which resolved to commend the zealous efforts of our predecessors

and the Council's contribution to society. The meeting was followed by a

gala show at the City Hall which featured the cultural presentation by the

Council's performing companies. All of us who were present there that

evening would agree that the events were gracefully conducted yet at the

same time enjoyable. To the staff of the Urban Services Department, the

Council presented an extremely entertaining show highlighting Ms. Francis

YIP who fascinated the audience with her charm, wit and artistic talents.

During the year, the Council mounted cleansing exhibitions, cultural and

entertainment performances as well as international sports events. These

presentations drew good attendance as well as wide public acclaim. The

November firework display, generously sponsored, left a lingering imprint on

the memory of all who were there to appreciate the magnificence of the

creative patterns and colors. The Centenary Carnival in December was well

supported by the district boards and by a turnout as big as 55,000, whose

enthusiasm was really festive and overwhelming.

Behind all these spectacular glamours lies the very hard work of all select

committees. Their efforts had blended the normal events of the year with a

special flavour of prominence. For this quality of service, I propose a

special vote of thanks.

We always caution ourselves against lavish spending, although the pleasure

it brought to the massive number of Hong Kong people clearly justifies the

festive celebration. In this connection, the Centenary Committee has

devised ways and means to economize expenditure in its operation.

Moreover, additional revenue was secured during the year, when souvenirs

such as key chains, first day covers, T-shirts and silver medallions were sold

to meet popular demand. With the exception of the silver medallion, the

Centenary Committee had to rush urgent orders on these items to cope with

the impressive volume of sales.

The silver medallion was worth special mention. With a restricted mint

quantity, the issue was over-subscribed. This level of public response might

have been partly induced by the Hang Seng Bank which served as its selling

agent. The Centenary Committee gratefully acknowledged such kindness, to

which I propose a vote of thanks. Balanced against the sale of the silver

medallions and souvenirs, net total expenditure is less than $600,000.

Needless to say, this spending represents good value for money.

Punctuating these colorful events of the year were two contests. One was

the selection of the staff baby born on the evening of the Centenary

celebrations. The other, perhaps more significant was the location of the

oldest person in

Share This Page