3.
Hamlyn Taylor, Neck
The
point raised at 'x'
one which
25/1/50
ні
ņ
mentioned in
2-2-50.
4
the
(3) is my minute of
connection witho (1) opposite. With
I have
made a further
but with out
the aid again of Legal Library
further effort to determine the $1945
fate of G.N. NO. 5
Success.
I suggest that
we
should reply
in
Qu
df opposite. If this goes off rapidly
enable
of rapidly & we
reply by return it should
get
an
enguing off to Hong
the information back here in
receive a
no to
Kong of the
it before. 15/2/50.
له
time to let Hamlyn Taylor & Neck have
? &o proceed.
Jan
6/2/50
I hve attached a copy of a note which acompanced the cheques
at when they
un retured, he new
of the terms of the note
it would appear that the parties were to settle there clains
thunelusa.. that G.N.NO.5 ms to Capse.
I love :. exuded the draft upply slightly & as it is to
Solicitors I pan
S.N.5/45
it
thigh to Agal adicar.
was an
Illall
2/2
Onder, not a regulation, and
it is not stated under what Defence Regulation
it was
mahe doubt whether the Onder
was revoked. It was not mentioned
in Proclamation 30/1946 (Aprilig46) and the