dis berasement of the £105,000.
but
6
Brig: Rabeation had suggests that
be
might produce some
I think it would be a
Thing further.
waste y
time to noter T. H.K.
again
Las
and
attach a
actly
on these lines.
5
It cal
P. Petersh
بارکه
Will
w.o.uk Alpendia" "E"
seymour 6(5) a 55136/20/47
912 m
11. 7.51
6
So we seymour
answ (5) ►
30.7.51
M' Hall
PL. see (6).
am not happy about this.
Our sees
Col. Seymour's point, but at the same time I do not agree that it wot be simple for H.K. to produce further evidence. I do not consider that a Colmy that has been occupied by the Japanese can be expected to produce meticulous records of expenditure.
Moreover, I do not think that the W.O.
have really studied what informatio get out of H. v.
?
We
as in J. h., which is
1
we have been able to
might try another approach to Cal. Seymour
self-explanatory. J.A. Androm
9/8.
Wall
1/6 atten