lost may
well
have to be considered
!
8
with other factors in deciding how fully the
showed be met; it does however
the materials
H.V. claim
to me
Seem
(if indeed they
that the
loss
were lost)
not H.K's.
of the a
W.O
loss
However
ive
must wait a sec
2
the meantimé
we
might
that tim
އ
dfr
leb Five know
ings are being delayed.
4/12/50
J
ague
with
first para of the Lawcloghi
Just
which
70
hove
that
chev
opai
care
5 wo
ussent
ought
silence
we
not
жу
not let cham
he interpreted
Ca
4/1~
I do not think we need
we need go at to H.K yet until
further reparation for the W.0.
we secure
I ague with Me laber that we she go back to the wo now.
The last column of the statement ucbored with (15) scurtis
"Payment will be made an perductions of (clean) dipping documents" " It would be interesting to know of any documents were proposed if 89 the property then leave the W.D's & they should foot the hill.
J
any
case I do not thich we should accept the w.s. argument it
this stage & in rder to keep the record stright.
lo.
a should tell them
of we are going not to M.K, in stuld inform them of this latest
duckyment so that they can
Il dff to w.o. for court.
thaih
луч
Dfs w/w I Pandangh
14.231
ним
of mussary!
Kaall 4/m
Page
To Lt Gse Gr. Seymour (NO) Ref(18)
20 Hong Kong Doop 35ML F
W
S (18)
and (19)
་
il
20/12/50
2o DEC 1950
22/2)
:
Wait,
B. U. - no reply to (19)
I 22/1/5,
ak
201
C