18
10. 10.50.
27
Gilbert Marriman
Miss Bocock,
? his is private chattels.
(27) should presumably
If
be
al. Fandang
19/10/50
regritted with you?
pana. sounds as
the H.K. Residents Assoc.
The second
though
in Sydney
are
thinking of the B.O.T's proposed extension of the Chattels scheme to the Domnias
(B.0.T. have been telling individual applicants that it is under carson)
The reply
to (27) has been
delayed because, as Men. Hainimen seemed to be incligible under
the proposed extension, I wanked
the stock
to ace whok B.O.T. reply
to
such people. Copies have now come in but on second thoughts
it seems
mere prudent not to
introdure this aspect,
من
Mw.
Harriman does not. It seems
advisable, however, in writing
1t