4th reference to the particular questione sed by yu unk: peragregh 3 1.
(1, bea not rally arios bocause the military did in foot interfere with the tunnel but it has alr·:ody bian me:ered by my paragraph 3,
(ii; Tháo hoa already been answered by -y paragraph54 and 5.
(134) Jae my para re h 3.
(iv
In ry view it would not have been sufficient to sam the civilian population but it was the lost that could have been done
(♥, (me my paragraph 4,
he liability of the r
7, I have not dealt with the question of Departent for the negligene of its servanta beoma: 1 hav: «ssu od that there is no question of wishing to deny legal res onsibility on
is ground.
I have the honour to be,
348,
Your obedient Jervant,
Osorg
Jorge
brickland.
\øting Attorney General.
66