the Civil
were
рис
Civil Goot because these claims put forward after the handover
If we agreed
agre trability of
date.
covers
this fort
that the til.
have to accept their contention. precise scope of One (D) was not
clearly defined; your
shd.
The
your minute of 20/2/46 on
55217/6/4A/47 recorded that the Civil Gast. might
Gost might (upparently by
gentleman's agreement reached
meeting challenge any
at a
with Loo.
unusual
bills presented after the handover with
a
view to having
Set down ao
having the amount of them
redendtion of the Goot's
cost of the
a
antibution towards the
Вта
But now that the entire
question of such contributiones has ben
this pros
procedure cannot
waived, this
xit would
siem
operate;
that HK cod. be
at least morally bound to bear
such a
3
that
bill themselves.
Our argument
the
argument must
parent claim
therefore be
clann is entirely
tel. 07133.
antride the terms of
I see two lives of attack:-
cartainly not (a) a claim for damages
not a
(b) the tel apperes to claims
against the Boma
the Ama, ie the
Give
7