can consider this
whether we
auggestion at all. since this project 4
of fears to have been decided upon to
use of the money, heat I should be grateful for your advice as
whether such action can
be considered
P. Pethemails
8%
Mrs. Pechersk
There is
t
objection to
The
£5,000
Some
saterprod that satisfied
being weed
we and
that showed
ba
Cdow. Voce
other purpose provided
The propul is
amitie
from
Ite
provided that
Treamery agnesment
Ove
we get
World Hong Kong &
Pacific Dyt. be prepared
to support
The proposal?
to. 3 tamily
Seems
to be
after thought.
Nembroń
11/6
M' Hall.
H.K. were given
Au
interim grant of £5000
a
start
In Nov. '49 to enable them to make (para 3b of (6)/49).
was made
Ꮕ
thair piess scheme.
In Feb. '51 a grant of £48,883
the form was asked for details of how
the intrim grant had been expended. (Para 2 of (9)/50.)
the interim grant In (1) herem the Ger' explained that the interim had been allowed to lapse, but in (2) he asked that (1) sht be regarded
In (3) the Garr
now
as cancelled.
bobs up
cheerfully asks
that