Init
4
is up to them to do so without bringing us into the matter at all since these appointments are personal to the Governor. I am not aware that the Whower aboy hid the line of this!
Perhaps you could advise me as to what reply I should sent to No. (3).
201
4. 9. 1951.
Applo.
Hola, which
are no
normally
personal appts. to her Evor's staff.
his are
cod.
not dealt with wi CBD. since the
appt.
is not to tre Cal. Service. I believe
Ecographical Depto. as correspond with the Service Depto. In regard to such appts.
and
very offer make the offer on behalf hat Love.
Mr Sidebotham,
DR. Pandaugh
449
This is the position, so far as
I know.
а
I am not sure that a reply to No. 3 is needed, a I she be disposed to lat the matter Wof hill another,
rest
Case arises.
KaB Kush 511
579
of silence Lamy,
guris consent
Mr. Sweaney
Irday
I had a word with Mr. Gordon Williams gastanley, who I
I gather that you have,
think also spoke to you, about this. from time to time, on your side of C.S.D. dealt with applications.
I do not know what our practice has been on these matters see my minute of 4/9 but X of paragraph 2 of (3) seems to go too far in involving us.
...
I should be grateful for your views as to what reply I should send, or alternatively whether we should let the matter drop until the next time. (I dislike the position, besides having reason to reseny, if the same sort of point arises again
wote unarity in Hong Kong)
6. 9. 1951.