To bongkong laving 322-
bonfidential
- Ref (2) 20 MAR 28
4
27-3-50
5. P.D. Coates (F.0)
we (4)
鄂
6. for
tel. 507 Sar.com/
8-5-50.
Mr Hall.
(Ref. 2.4).
We spoke.
?
Mr Trunch
is
Sure
in off?
I in
that Peking will object
to them action being taken under the ordinance,
but he wo prefer to see
our letter before commenting
further.
7 N.C.C. French (6.0)
J. J.Abram.
16/5
misel
16/5K.
20-5-50.
Mr Sidelo tham
There are the pp the Shattock mentioned to you. Para 7 of (6) suggested that Me Hutchison should be consalted. this reply only came in lost night & is still to be copied but needless to say is against action bing taken under the Repulsion of Undesirable,
Grd 1949.
he
The letter in wrote to the F.O. is at (7) 4 Mr Tunch has promised to let us here the F.O. wins within the next day
or so.
I understand
they think that as deporters" under the existing low on aly accepted by the C.d.fut with reluctance, the C.. Good would refuse to accept large numbers of deporties under the Expelicon Ord & therefore there would