You
So. 1080
ansin. (21)
26.9. 51
8
For Hinshelwood.
Please
Cornes:
about Bailey Co Ltd at 16, enct:
I 19 where Lreasury ask for confermation that no avacts of Bailey. Co exist
from which
any recovery could have
been made, and 23.
how that Hong Kong have
confirmed that there are assets
available from which a claim could
have been met in fast? de
you
agree that when
writing & the Bear befficie we should let them know that we are in entire agreement with the Governors views at X of 23, and consider that no action
hould be taken at this stage to make a claim against Bailey li
-2
assels which
are available.
1. Petherite
10.
ths Petherick,
sending
I should be cautions, and
Qa
copy of (23) to w.o., semple
Governor.
observe that the
the recommendation.
has made
I While we may be in agreement with
's views, it is not ou
the Governor's
and it would
be unwisė
concen
to get drawn.
Page
Page
into discussion with the Treasury
9
on etres point)
I. Annabelwood 18/10/57.
22.x. 51
24
-Schelt W.O.
w/c (22)
25 you
26 behelt w.o.
27 w.o.
سل
Sow 1188
w/e (25)
24.10.5
3. 11. 51
26.10.51
16/Abas (2900 (F.1)
Put by
KD. Clank
3⁄4
at curre
B/a
-
nothing further to last para. of (20). R.J. Barnes. 24/1/5/
Await reply to (26)
Kes. Clock 24/11
atamee
H.616
B/u
no
reply to (26).
R.Z. Barnes. 1/12/51
Al dft letter to the tickett w.o. sef (26) & enquire whether mary afone H.16., with ref to last antenue of (25), that the w.o is satisfied with the exploratius
Wall
4/12
atu
7/1/s 28 Schett W.O.
Pr
P
7.12.51