Im Palmer Im Robison In Harvey
In Hall
12
minute
Aft k/w.
I think the point at 'X' of Un Hawery's
is covered
дни
77
of 10/5/50
by paragraph ?? of the Report. I have therefore not mentioned it
in the Ift.
I have not raised Miss Gwilliam's
+ Dr Harlow's points in view of then minutes of 8/9/50 + 4/3/50
with
Zne
glad if
In Robison ruined point (iv)
over
the telephone.
I shared be
In Palmer could have a
look at
that there
this sub-paragraph to make sure
simple explanation for the apponent discrepancies, which I have overlooked.
is no
do not
kuom
the explanation by
what
the
differences; but they
suge
Thought
necessitate
Zr Fanclough
ave
comment
Выйти
•
I and not make
para. 139.
Jr
A.. Janidough
96/9/50
handly of sufferent
I harold
have
apain mas
I am of
faperes quouis for
X Recurus charges
ир
cca Ma
was!
than the
Personal Instincts
ove
Арескай справый
atter
to more
Mai
the Colal
Enslin 1.6.
$11.668.656.
komen is mor