In Palmer DG.C.A In Back
1. The supplementary expenditure nearly $3 million reported in (4)
Appoite
Control
was
clearly outside Hill's
а
orders
as it resulted from delayed being met. Under the present awangements for supervision of Hike's finances
items
approval"
?
over
$1 million
non- recurent.
need om
approve
2. Through an oversight
on
my
pant
что
D.G.C.A. did not see (12); he will doubt be interested to see now.
MR. HALL.
Lefever 914
8/3/50
3468/1.
I see no objection to approval being given
for the excess expenditure reported in (14).
2.
No: (12) Seen, thank you.
ма
D.D.G.C.A.
14.9.1950.
(14) We
my offers.
Well
IM/S.
19 SEP 1960
Saw 954
15 Hay Kay dad