approval

Gegeven.

q should however

be grateful

(~

te

7 Mi Palmer

& the D.G.C.A.

upen

Le

suggestion in

Para 3

Provided

equivalent

revenue

the

expenditure

reference

why

the

ansis

directly

from

4

should requiri

5 Gov. Secret Sov. J?

6 Gov. Bony. Sav. 446

In Palmer. In how

see In Radford's misinte

as regards (3) < (4) opposite (3)а(+)

5.95 ?

Blacked

17.450.

21.450.

4/4

D.G.CA. to

21/4 above

In Palmer to see (5) ~ (6);; to which

Я

can see

no Sjection. As regards

(5) I ans not clear whether the

expenditure referred to is likely to be recurrent; if not then Story kong need not have referred the matter to

para 3 (ii) of (25)

on

(see

541260/5/48). Perhaps

3

Share This Page