the H.K. fort for the whole amout
-n
4
at least for the 4,400 lags.
Ir Danett me timed this matter briefly at a Tranny meeting
the other day & said their new
& said their new was that if say in a bonded wave house
in the U.K, certain goods were set aside for Navy
I
only a
portion of there were und & the Enlance destroyed by enemy action, He Navy would sly may for the quantity actually and. I do not know if this is comuet, & if so, whether it naturally follows that the same would apply in H.1. I would add that there was no un compensaten er inverance schone in H.K. & thenfore the fort cannot reimburse themceles from any
mich source.
Could you please adiere whether the Solector Generali qunin
диль
a cral (10) to (3) is a xaconable me & whether the
H.K. claim that as the flor
Lothy
requentioned at the request of
He Naval authorities note the Nary resprouble for paying for it although
they may consumed
400 hays at of 7,255?
Illall
3/3.
Mr Hall.
1. The
добочого of flom which
لا
Th
s for 335,500 requisitioned by the
I A5
#5 win
Hik. goot on behalf of the
Col. Def hys. 1940
Wason why
Li
should not
the Aut should
limbile for
The fact that the
2
L
620
me
inscribed
16
Th
Zi
be
the full amount.
wring
in the melevant
loss from the
مال
amoment of bags
wamant
Sum
the Asti suffered
enumeration.
mistaken
All wal
4. },
DH
он жил
长