با
we should have to give good reasons to Hong Kong why this was so. We also suggested that the interim settlement of £10,000 proposed for the War Supplies Board claim could safely be raised to £12,500. As a result of this letter Mr. Radford went over to the War Office and with Major Jefferies there went through their papers regarding Item 3. The result was to discover some evidence that Hong Kong (besides preparing etc. the wagons in question for shipment) did supply at least some deficient material. The War Office contention in (47) on the 1948 file is that all the deficient material was supplied by India, not Hong Kong).
3. In (1) the War Office now agree to raise the interim offer on the War Supplies Board claim to £12,500 and supply copies of the evidence relating to Item 3 discovered by Mr. Radford.
do not however proceed from that to the obvious conclusion drawn in paragraph 3 of my proposed draft to Colonel Seymour (draft A) and
They
incorporated in paragraph 3 of the draft Savingram to Hong Kong (Draft B).
Jaseem
возвани
7.2.49.
812
83
2 Col Seymour ho.0.
To soft 10 o'suds
Cons 8·2·49
1
Spartan & Draper Jefferies. A reply from dritten
And the Chime claims has re
received and in
or content
the clarimg
and
008
༡
inchers 009 010
.016).
clains has recently
V
in the W.O.
? £785,84) m
.o
rochers 003 004 006, 007
under conson
The valuation
006,007
(
~
the larger
mentions
(en
covering
andh, in tinching clarionover. I 900, ord
7900
свежу
009 and 000 (
phoney my vouchers £915,449) ammol 011 h £27.000.
Rajor Jeffries
omnity reference to make
aprees
Im dyp s'gram