23
Is it the case that for this sum the Kowloon
-Canton Railway (British Section) contracted
in 1941 to manufacture all missing parts, and to sort, marks and prepare
to
existing materials and/deliver all parts on board ship,
specified vessels, but that owing to the incidence
of the Japanese war the missing parts were, in the
event, manufactured not in Hong Kong, but in India?
Or was it in fact never intended that the Kowloon
Canton Railway (British Section) should do more
mark and pragnes
than sort the existing wagon materials and deliver them
it to the ship?
M
board ship?
4. So far as the War Supplies Board claim is
concerned we agree that it is not possible, at this
stage, to formulate alfigure in full and final
(as suggest, the vines settlement and we think that in the circumstances/ the Hmy King Svemment might well be sought in an interim settlement. interim settlement ought to be made. This we suggest might
freight charges plus 2% should be a sum equivalent to the total freight-okerges, Amin in on the admitted Chinese and British Section's plus 2% commission calculated en your valuation of these
chains come 6 (7) Hong Kong and Chinese clams which are admitted in principle,
fem
We should prefer to dispose of these metters
before making an approach to Hong Kong on the other
points dealt with in your letter and we think it might
De profitable if we could discuss them with you at
a further meeting. Perhaps you would let me know
by telephone whether you agree to this suggestion
and if so we could arrange to meet as may be mutually
convenient.
5. Perhaps the simplest and quickest matters of
setting the poing then and women be
discussion
wutually
ぬ
and med impone ups
we might avenge a
you open ho
meeting
letter
baby
дворовете
and one teasing this within to Conter (Foreign (he)
E
Len sunceled. Wass=
Since howeven the
081
12:5000
riffie)
uught we wo
with safety trappe tot on the figure
in the m
Corian settlement of the claim.