6
with the terms proposed, by Stay Kay
is, I think, all that is reg
he
aquels
regs.
WD Brearly 2218157
have
I put up a
short draft to the Treasury
me. Sweaway's winte
as suggested in me.
above
Willimas
addressed it to me.
the previous correspondance
thave
Suice
was
with nim
I he will
no doubt
discuss with
me. Serpell.
my Sweeney
13. Why le 29/8.
g
a
afraid
we
are still not
clear in
1
Ca
E. Dept. on the details of No.13.
understand how
you reached
the figure of $26, 950, quoted in your
>
but how is that reconciled
the fact that the
minute
with
same figure is
given for
150
years in the savingram.
Also why should the figure for 75 years
be only $1,423 less them that
that no
for 150 years:
figure is given for 25
☺ note
years!
4
ms. Butters
may
be
able
to help.
suggest that
D-3. Why to 39/8