29
50
involved in the fire with the exception of the Sodium Bichromate.
Had
the godown been inspected on that occasion, it is possible that the pre-
sence of these substances might have been disclosed and their removal
ordered. It is unfortunate that a more thorough inspection was not
made, but we accept the Chief Officer's evidence that his visit was
of a casual rather than deliberate nature and that unlike the first oc
casion, he did not have the "reasonable grounds" for inspection required
by the Dangerous Goods and Cinematograph Film Ordinances.
Page 50Page 51