.3 civs 2
loƆ srit 101 9
spać adi mOTA
smevod odi gaineteinbA 10 sdt 67
916€
C
.344
•anivse Epc
amendment of the Act and would be void as repugnant to the Act under the Colonial Laws Validity Act, 1865.
(b) Even if it could be maintained that the Court was properly constituted and capable of lawfully exercising jurisdiction, the question might arise as to whether the provision of the Hong
Kong (Non-Domiciled Parties) Divorce Rules, 1936, made under the Act of 1926 were, or could be, complied with - e.g. Rules 3, 4, 20 and 25. Any Hong Kong Ordinance repugnant to the Rules would likewise
be ultra vires.
f. a. (16)
SECER.