CONFIDENTIAL

HONG LONG FORT ADMINISTRATION INQUIRY COMMITTEE

Comments by ir. J. Jolly, C.B.F., R.D., Harbour Master, Hong Kong, in response to an invication to relate the viers expressed ir his me oranda considered by the Committee more closely to the Committee's Terms of Reference.

130

APPENDIX I (G)

4th October, 1946

"With reference to your letter No.25/581/1946 of the 30th September, 1946, I have to say that there is not very much I can add to my various memoranda in the way of general observations, but I will set down my present views in the light of His Excellency's terms of reference.

(a)

In my opinion the Owen Report represents a compromise between a body having autonomous control of the Port and its facilities, and a voluntary "Committee" deciding the affairs of the smaller vested interests while leaving the major port interests almost complete freedom of action,

As I have said before, the development projects are not original, but as assembled they are the best part of the Report provided, of course, they are all justified by the future requirements of commerce.

-

I feel that it would be extremely difficult to estimate the future tonnage of the world, for countries are disposed to become more self-supporting and thus restrict the huge movement of goods which obtained in the past.

Also, vessels are king speeded up and ocean transports are increasing in size while more people are travelling by air.

It may well be that ambitious schemes may prove unnecessary, and the Port could well meet the future by allowing private enterprise to develop along agreed lines.

A Trust along the line envisaged by the Owen Report would not, in my opinion, be in the public interest.

(b) I know of no really serious deficiencies in the present

system of administration, and I ascribe the present condition of "stalemate" to Government's undeclared policy with reference to Pier Leases. Normal development would have gone along but for the implied threat that the holders of pier licences might easily be deprived of their rights in 1949.

That alone has quite a lot to do with the dilapidated piers along Connaught Rond, and the "go easy" policy of the Godown Companies who normally are most progressive and ready and willing to develop provided they have some form of assurance for the future.

(Continued)

Page 130Page 131

Share This Page