See
introduced from
1.1.46.
discretion of
and
the
it is presumably 5 H.K. Govt. to
cases
the benefit of it in these
(31)(42)
(47)
within the
1946, 1447
with hold
file.
So far
since
in HK service.
the
1.1.47 revisie in
these ex-policemer
on
1.1.48.
were
in
cerned,
fact
(the date of
final approval of the Salaries Commerman's
recommendations)
dations) it might be held that
entated
to retrospective benefit- prouided by the first sentence
yes gell they
ave
para 194 of the Salaris Commmersion Report
a
copy of which I have placed opposite). Again however it is clearly within the Governors with hold benefit since the
dication
Salaries Camussion recommendation
Pas
Zegal force
and
in
any
Casse
t is
permissive in from and does not confer
right.
Mr Fawelough will perhaps comment
the point
about the onussion in Police
Pension Regulations of provision for abolition factor,
in
para 4
to which
reference is made of ench II to (5). I think the
explanation offered by Hong Kong is
with which we would
reasonable
agree
I agree JE King
Bradford
6/10