the repeteration expenses dealt with in (5), but pertapo
you will look into it.
muggest
If they do not I
I Hong Kong might
ta
Cam
Hoow any
any light
the Instions doing in
in
beashed if they What wan
the matter.
Hong Kong
nothy
Go do
with the Corny.
6. C.R.O.
Ref. 5
Perhaps My Love
8/1
19-11-49.
Ref (5) I have not been able to
of the nature
find any pips.
referred to in his Chaplin's ministe
the of
-of%
It would appear from 55080/46
and 55270/2/6/46
that early in 1946 the Malayan Govt. Representative
in Judea took over, from the boot. of India, payments to Indians who were H.K. Gost employees and had corres with C.C.A.O in H. Kong though
Chanchal Singh
on 1st list with (5) is the only
70/2/6/46.
person also listed in euch. to 5 on 55276
We have cards
for a few of the persons listed at (5) and it would appear that they
mainly employees of the Govt. of Hong Kong
were
though there
may
be some
employees of the
Admiralty (R.N. Dockyard blice)
The embarkation roll for Cheshire
forwarded by R.A.P.W.I. (209/10253/2/46) does not mention these Indians but it would not appear from
our records that they
would not
were interned and they therefore, strictly speaking be R.A.P.W.I.
with regard to 1(a) of her Wallace's mis a reminder is being sent to Malaya
On
of 4/11
155413/7/481/1/12