pares to of

No 54

M2 Doom Jeannot prefy this. It is un Orde

€ 10.544

not

behand No. 57, but CM Balti

me that

auth is

the case

Draft to secking in brefchste

43

137

40]

3.

how to st

(a) or (b) became fully subscribed.

You

would

be able for

doubtlessydecide upon the manner

in which the $150,000,000 ould be divided

amongst (a), (b) and (c)in the light of local

conditions.

4.

As regards the proposal i

£3 mil hous to borrow from the Exchange Fund up to $50 millions

for 25 years at 2%, I would prefer a straight

investment by the Fund in the proposed loan referred

at the cursed forms

to at (a) above, or in any further issue, in the

it is

unders (vod Chai same terms might be decided upon. As the profits on

rerne to the benefit of

x

the Fund Mit the Colony, it is not

apparent what advantage there would be in paying a

reduced rate of interest compared with th t paid on the

loan issued to the public I sho ld not object in

the wron were not otherumi felly subsented principle to such an investment/provided the amount so

invested did not reduce the readily convertible

assets of the Fund below the safety level. I should

therefore be glad to receive details of the latest

together with an assessment of the note issuing Banks positive in figures of the Fund's assets and liabilities/in order

this maller that I may consider further, but this need not

delay the enactment of the Ordinanc

No 152

5. ès regaris paragraph 5 of your telegram/ enclosure (b) of my savingram No. 115 provided for the annual

sinking fund contribution to be remitted to the Crown

Agents for investments to be ap roved by me; and (c)

of my telegram No. 220 envisaged use of the Fund to

purchase loan if price of 1 an fell below par, Crown

Agents point out that in fact conditions may be such

1

that even above par the loan may be the best

investment of the sinking fund; but it would be

inadvisable to include provision for making the

purchase obligatory if loan fell below par as this

might lead to manipulation of market against the

Government.

There would be no objection to provision being

this respect

[Most

made

Share This Page