2
in part at a high
receive
time
CA
rate and might possibly higher salary than
teacher
full
3
Ex) it is possible that the provisions of
to anomal
Paragraph 18 will give vire to in diniy building schemer costing less
than $80,000 may larger subsidy than one costing
than $20,
000
receive
much
wate
although the circumstances
are equivalent. This
being deliberatily planned to cost less
than $20,000 merely
might
lead to schemes
eligibility
Joven of sliding
for a higher subridy, it would 'it not
be better if
scale for assessing subsides could
be devised
(IN) the word
?
"approved" might be
inserted before "educational purposes"
Para 20 G).
(iv) the wor
wording of para. 26 does not
clearly indicate what is meant by "higher standards" There should perhaps
be definitions of
་་
course
thi
the term
and "middle school course
paragraph
pruimary
used
helpful.
Seca,