to Hong Kong conveying
revised Subsidy
of the
17
approval
Code submitted at
(19) but drawing attention to
number
of points.
The Sub Committee
ACEC expressed doubt
need for the Subsidy Code
of the
to the
in addition
to the Grant Code. It is time that both Codes provide for assistanc
to Vemacula Schools, but
different rates
It
neeum
should raise
the point.
we
much whether
decided
needed but rather
i
at materially
to ine that
is not
both Codes are
how basis it
which Code
is appropriate
particular school.
I have
which might appear to Hong
not
included in
the savingram the
comment
at 2(a)
of (20)
Kong to be have
comment
a
included
somewhat querulous. I
at
not
Sub. Committee
2 (iii) in the draft
raised
by the
which might nevertheless
be
worth making.
All right-h all right
i
Advisers
BRadford
1/1/49
In vers 9 (21) Then made on I'm "Priority".
view
mor appe
I do paragram (iii) disencia
3/
I consider the Devincin's
Came
sugges
ретрор
184
the Beeland
.as
sufficiers safeguard against
Come is a