for higher
The group (d) vates
allowances than
1
in
group (b).
represent the
biggest increase
existing rates and
all thought of "taper" (s
*
E
WUJ
case here
see 12 (-e) & (C) m
this file) has disappeared. However the
in straight forward suice the
equivalent," or slightly
مقلمة
proposed
less than Singapore rates. The relative
costs of living may be problematical
certamily sufficiently
but they equivalent
are
to
obviate
serious
ang
object com
là de
adopt in
이
the
sami
valer of C‚O.L‚A.
4-
The Lo Committee have endorsed the
procedure for future
principles and
of CO.L.A.
revisim
an
H.K.
which
result of discursio
were agreed between
and fungapore (vede 16) and
Je commend
in
para 36 5
the
they
ther's Report
basis for linking changes in
with changes in
Figure. This
accepti with
5.
CO.L.A.
Retail Price Index
recommendation the Governor
ove
Bearning
M
put forward by the
provvio.
wind that these proposals
Governor
are based
his consideration of the report of a
special committee
who have
gone very
carefully into this question of C.-L.A. the spot. A think that, unless we that the proposals are
are
going
ฯ
say
fundamentally unacceptable, we must-
accept.
the Treasury with greater
them
they stand and informe
Cesser degree
of finality that we
propose.
I have
sent
20
copy of (21) to the Treasury and
I should be grateful
four of Palmers